Attention Improves Population Codes by Warping Neural Manifolds in Human Visual Cortex
You, Y.-Q.; Li, S.; Cheng, Y.-A.; Li, Y.; Kay, K.; Zhang, R.-Y.
Show abstract
Decades of research on visual attention have revealed its numerous effects on neural responses. Two competing models have been proposed for how these effects lead to improved population representations: one highlights changes in neural tuning, while the other points towards changes in trial-by-trial noise correlations. Here, we develop a neural population manifold framework that interprets changes in neural responses as geometric transformations in high-dimensional neural space, allowing us to disentangle and quantify the effects of tuning changes and correlation changes induced by attention. Applying this framework to extensive measurements of cortical responses during different attentional tasks, we find that tuning changes are the primary driver of improved population representations. In contrast, correlation changes, though present, have minimal--or even detrimental--effects to information content due to its strong interactions with other changes (e.g., tuning, variability). Our results support the "tuning change" model of visual attention and demonstrate a general framework for adjudicating how different aspects of neural coding affect information processing.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rethinking simultaneous suppression in visual cortex via compressive spatiotemporal population receptive fields 98%
- Holistic face recognition is an emergent phenomenon of spatial integration in face-selective regions 97%
- Object representations in the human brain reflect the co-occurrence statistics of vision and language 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unraveling the mesoscale resting-state functional connectivity of ocular dominance columns in humans using high-resolution functional MRI. 97%
- Neural Processing of Naturalistic Audiovisual Events in Space and Time 97%
- The spatial layout of antagonistic brain regions is explicable based on geometric principles 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial processing of limbs reveals the center-periphery bias in high level visual cortex follows a nonlinear topography 98%
- Representational geometries reveal differential effects of response correlations on population codes in neurophysiology and functional magnetic resonance imaging 98%
- Neural evidence for boundary updating as the source of the repulsive bias in classification 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.