Back

Fair-weather friends: Unequal partnerships between Parastagonospora nodorum and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis define disease dynamics in wheat

Lenzo, L. V.; John, E.; Bradley, J.; Thomas, G.; Bennett, D.; Tan, K.-C.

2025-10-10 microbiology
10.1101/2025.10.09.681059 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Parastagonospora nodorum and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis are the causal agents of septoria nodorum blotch and tan spot of wheat, respectively. Though these fungal phytopathogens have been found to frequently cohabitate the same leaf, their interaction dynamics in the manifestation of disease remain poorly understood due to limitations in species-specific detection methods. We developed a digital PCR based model targeting conserved regions of the -tubulin gene, enabling biomass quantification of both pathogens during infection. Field surveys revealed up to two in three symptomatic infections involved both pathogens, with co-infected plants showing significantly higher individual pathogen biomass than single-species infections. Host plants in the field with moderate resistance to both pathogens were found to be significantly more necrotic under co-infection, with individual pathogen biomass up to twice that observed value for single infections. However, like fair-weather friends the partnership between these two pathogens seems to be conditional.When P. tritici-repentisestablished first, secondary P. nodorumcolonisationled to a breakdown of host resistance. Conversely, when P. nodorum established on the host first, it suppressed P. tritici-repentis colonisation regardless of host resistance. To our knowledge this is the first description of asymmetric priority effects overcoming host resistance in a plant pathosystem. Resistance breeding strategies evaluating single pathogen challenges may inadvertently select for cultivars vulnerable to sequential co-infection, necessitating integrated disease complex approaches for durable resistance development.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.9%
3
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
4
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.1%
5
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
7
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
9
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
12
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.6%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
15
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
16
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.2%
18
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
26
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
28
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%