Innovations in spinal cord cell type heterogeneity across vertebrate evolution
Ignatyev, Y.; Papadopoulos, S.; Soretic, M.; Yeung, J.; Lin, T.-Y.; Tanaka, E.; Peshkin, L.; Levine, A.; Gabitto, M. I.; Sweeney, L. B.
Show abstract
Vertebrates display remarkable diversity of sensorimotor behaviors, each adapted to distinct ecological and survival demands. This diversity raises fundamental questions about the evolutionary origin of motor control: do conserved spinal circuits underlie these behaviors, and how have they diverged across species. Recent studies detail spinal cell-type architecture in mammals but comparable, high-resolution atlases of the non-mammalian spinal cord are lacking. Here, we compare spinal cord cell types between fish, frogs, mice and humans, spanning [~]450 million years of evolution. Across species, we define highly conserved programs of cell type specification that segregate spinal neurons into nearly identical cardinal classes during development. This contrasts with adult stages, when spinal cell-type composition selectively diverges for excitatory neuron subpopulations. Using spatial transcriptomics, we localize this species divergence to the superficial, dorsal spinal cord, where variant neuropeptide expression defines mammalian-specific cell types. The most dorsal spinal cord thus emerges as a recently evolved hub for sensory integration in mammals, a neospinal cord analogous to the neocortex.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cellular and transcriptional trajectories of neural fate specification in sea anemone uncover two modes of adult neurogenesis 97%
- TAD Evolutionary and functional characterization reveals diversity in mammalian TAD boundary properties and function 97%
- Projection-TAGs enable multiplex projection tracing and multi-modal profiling of projection neurons 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.