Back

Clinical validation of a statin-benefit polygenic score using real-world cohorts of primary prevention participants

Haldar, T.; Lee, K.; teerlink, C.; Iyer, K. R.; Lu, M.; Bress, A. P.; Tcheandjieu, C.; Tsao, P. S.; Chang, K.-M.; Krauss, R. M.; Risch, N.; Iribarren, C.; Lynch, J.; Oni-Orisan, A.

2025-10-13 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2025.10.09.25337698 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPolygenic risk scores derived from coronary artery disease genome-wide association studies are associated with statin relative risk reduction. ObjectiveExamine the relationship between coronary artery disease polygenic risk scores that include variants below thresholds of genome-wide significance and statin primary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events. MethodsWe generated coronary artery disease polygenic risk scores for participants with no past evidence of myocardial infarction from three electronic health record-linked genetic biobanks: All of Us Research Program, Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging, and the Million Veteran Program. We scored each participant using three different polygenic risk scores: two with both genome-wide and sub-genome-wide significant variants (metaGRS and PRS2022) and one with only variants meeting genome-wide significance (164SNP). We used covariate-adjusted Cox regression models to compare risk of major adverse cardiovascular events between statin users and nonusers matched on age, sex, smoking status, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypertension within strata defined by polygenic risk. For the primary analysis, we performed a meta-analysis across the three cohorts for the delta hazard ratio of statin effectiveness between high and low polygenic risk. ResultsAcross all cohorts, statin use was more strongly associated with reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events among participants with no myocardial infarction at index in the highest versus lowest polygenic risk score group for the PRS2022 (interaction beta 0.19, standard error 0.07, interaction P=2.3E-3) and metaGRS (interaction beta 0.14, standard error 0.07, interaction P=.02) scores. However, the association was not statistically significant (interaction beta 0.09, standard error 0.07, interaction P=.08) for the 164SNP risk score. ConclusionsWe demonstrated that the association between coronary artery disease polygenic risk scores and statin relative risk reduction can by enhanced with the inclusion of sub-genome-wide variants, paving the way for more research to establish clinical utility.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.