Accounting for Structured Missingness in Canonical Correlation Analysis
Radosavljevic, L.; Smith, S. M.; Nichols, T. E.
Show abstract
A particularly challenging form of missing data is structured missingness, where sets of subjects and variables consistently have missing data. For tabular data from sub-studies or modalities, structured missingness can come from non-participation in followup studies, which creates large blocks of missing data. Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) is a multivariate modelling tool commonly used to link two different set of variables, and in neuroimaging has typically been used to find associations between imaging and non-imaging variables. Motivated by CCA, we propose a new method for covariance estimation from incomplete data that handles data with a mix of structured and unstructured missingness, assuming Missing at Random (MAR). Our proposed method is compared to existing methodology by way of evaluation on simulated data and on real data from subjects in the UK Biobank brain imaging cohort.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Penalized reduced rank regression for multi-outcome survival data supports a common metabolic risk score for age-related diseases 95%
- A Stability-Enhanced Lasso Approach for Covariate Selection in Non-Linear Mixed Effect Model 93%
- A multivariate to multivariate approach for voxel-wise genome-wide association analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Soft Windowing Application to Improve Analysis of High-throughput Phenotyping Data 94%
- Nearest-neighbor Projected-Distance Regression (NPDR) for detecting network interactions with adjustments for multiple tests and confounding 94%
- Variable-Selection ANOVA Simultaneous Component Analysis (VASCA) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Topic Modeling analysis of the Allen Human Brain Atlas 93%
- Hybrid Autoencoder with Orthogonal Latent Space for Robust Population Structure Inference 93%
- Selecting the most important self-assessed features for predicting conversion to Mild Cognitive Impairment with Random Forest and Permutation-based methods 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.