Colonization Amplification despite Limited In-Hospital Transmission: Modeling the Epidemiological Paradox of C. difficile and the Impact of Control Strategies in Healthcare Settings.
De la Rosa Martinez, D.; Porco, T. C.; Hazel, A.; Liu, X.; Khader, K.; Blumberg, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundAlthough healthcare-associated transmission of C. difficile is a recognized public health concern, healthcare-onset infections (CDI) remain comparable in number to community-onset cases. This paradox likely reflects the underappreciated interplay between these settings. We aimed to quantify in-hospital transmission and the hospitals contribution to community colonization by estimating the intrinsic reproduction number (Ri) and introducing the colonization amplification index (Ai), defined as the ratio of colonized patients at discharge to those at admission. Given the potential contribution of external cases, we also evaluated interventions targeting asymptomatic carriers at admission to reduce disease burden. Methods and FindingsWe developed a compartmental model informed by data from UCSF Medical Center to capture C. difficile transmission dynamics among symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Across simulations, the median Ri was 0.58 (Q1-Q3: 0.50-0.65), consistently indicating limited sustained in-hospital transmission (Ri<1). In contrast, Ai was 1.9 (Q1-Q3: 1.7-2.1), suggesting substantial amplification of colonization during hospital stay. Sensitivity analyses showed that estimates were mainly influenced by discharge rates, antibiotic exposure, transmission rate, and case classification thresholds. Redefining hospital-onset CDI using thresholds from [≥]1 to [≥]5 days post-admission increased Ai and Ri by 13% and 17%, and reduced them by 5% and 9%, respectively. Interventions targeting asymptomatic carriers through contact precautions and/or prophylactic treatment reduced both Ai and CDI incidence, with combined interventions yielding the greatest reductions, followed by contact precautions alone. ConclusionsOur findings indicate that in-hospital transmission of C. difficile is limited (Ri<1) and likely sustained by continuous importation of cases from the community. Nevertheless, hospitalization amplifies colonization (Ai>1), further contributing to community transmission. These results underscore the importance of interventions addressing asymptomatic carriers, a currently overlooked source of spread. Our study highlights the need to broaden metrics beyond Ri to capture hospitals contribution to the C. difficile burden. Future infection control strategies should address colonization dynamics at admission and potentially at discharge to mitigate transmission and reduce the overall burden of C. difficile.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging infectious disease models to interpret randomized controlled trials: controlling enteric pathogen transmission through water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions 95%
- Quantifying the population-level impact of expanded antibiotic treatment for cholera outbreak management 95%
- Optimizing testing for COVID-19 in India 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mathematical modeling to inform vaccination strategies and testing approaches for COVID-19 in nursing homes 93%
- Improving the cost efficiency of preventive chemotherapy: impact of new diagnostics on stopping decisions for control of schistosomiasis 93%
- Strategies for using antigen rapid diagnostic tests to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in low- and middle-income countries: a mathematical modelling study applied to Zambia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of co-circulating pathogens on SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 surveillance: How concurrent epidemics may decrease true SARS-CoV-2 percent positivity 91%
- Accounting for imported cases in estimating the time-varying reproductive number of COVID-19 91%
- Clinical cholera surveillance sensitivity in Bangladesh and implications for large-scale disease control 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.