Differences in Auditory Brainstem Responses between Laboratory-reared and Wild-caught Prairie Voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
Joseph, L.; Colon-Rivera, N.; New, E. M.; Joseph, D. M.; Hurd, J. A.; Sergott, C. E.; McCullagh, E.
Show abstract
Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are a semi-fossorial rodent that are an emerging model in social neuroscience. Comparing laboratory-reared and wild-caught individuals is essential for understanding how environmental history shapes neural and sensory traits and for assessing the ecological validity of laboratory findings. Despite this, relatively few studies have taken this approach. We used auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to compare ABR thresholds and ABR wave characteristics between laboratory-reared and wild-caught prairie voles. ABR recordings show that, similar to other semi-fossorial rodents, M. ochrogaster exhibit a hearing range of 1 - 46 kHz with peak sensitivity around 8 to 32 kHz. However, wild-caught prairie voles displayed significantly lower ABR thresholds at 1, 4, 8, 16, and 24 kHz compared to laboratory-reared prairie voles. There were significant differences in interpeak latency between both tested groups, with laboratory-reared prairie voles showing faster interpeak latency responses than wild-caught voles. However, there were no differences in amplitude ratios between groups. Laboratory-reared prairie voles showed faster normalized latencies and higher relative amplitude of the binaural interaction component (BIC) of the ABR than wild-caught voles. There were no significant differences in ABR thresholds, interpeak latency, amplitude ratio, normalized latency, and relative amplitude between the sexes. These differences in auditory processing support the importance of integrating both wild and captive populations to advance comparative auditory research. SUMMARY STATEMENTWild and laboratory-reared prairie voles show distinct auditory processing, highlighting how environment history shapes hearing and underscoring the need for comparative studies.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Auditory Brainstem Responses in Two Closely Related Peromyscus Species (Peromyscus leucopus and Peromyscus maniculatus) 98%
- Alpha9alpha10 knockout mice show altered physiological and behavioral responses to signals in masking noise 95%
- Intrasubject variability in Potential Early Markers of Sensorineural Hearing Damage 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rescuing auditory temporal processing with a novel augmented acoustic environment in an animal model of congenital hearing loss 93%
- The Mouse Inferior Colliculus Responds Preferentially to Non-Ultrasonic Vocalizations 92%
- Deciphering compromised speech-in-noise intelligibility in older listeners: the role of cochlear synaptopathy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auditory decision-making deficits after permanent noise-induced hearing loss 92%
- Effect of digital noise-reduction processing on subcortical speech encoding and relationship to behavioral outcomes 92%
- Exposure to 1800 MHz LTE electromagnetic fields under proinflammatory conditions decreases the response strength and increases the acoustic threshold of auditory cortical neurons. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Noise-induced damage in the zebrafish inner ear endorgans: evidence for higher acoustic sensitivity of saccular and lagenar hair cells 94%
- Neural Basis of Acoustic Species Recognition in a Cryptic Species Complex 93%
- The distress context of social calls evokes a fear response in the bat Pipistrellus abramus 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.