Back

The functional landscape of the human ubiquitinome

van Gerwen, J.; Fottner, M.; Wang, S.; Busby, B.; Boswell, E.; Schnacke, P.; Carrano, A. C.; Bakowski, M. A.; Troemel, E. R.; Studer, R.; Strumillo, M.; Martin, M.-J.; Harper, J. W.; Lang, K.; Jones, A. R.; Bennett, E. J.; Vizcaino, J. A.; Barrio-Hernandez, I.; Beltrao, P.

2025-10-08 cell biology
10.1101/2025.10.08.681129 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein ubiquitination regulates cell biology through diverse avenues, from quality control-linked protein degradation to signaling functions such as modulating protein-protein interactions and enzyme activation. To date, hundreds of thousands of ubiquitination sites (ubi-sites) have been identified, however fewer than 1% have known functional roles. Here, we assembled a human reference ubiquitinome of 108,341 ubi-sites by harmonizing public proteomics data. To pinpoint critical regulatory events requiring ubiquitination at a precise site, we mapped ubi-site conservation across proteomics data from six non-human species. Perturbation proteomics revealed that highly conserved ubi-sites are more likely to regulate signaling functions rather than proteasomal degradation. To further prioritize site-specific ubiquitination relevant for organismal fitness, we constructed a machine learning-based positional importance score for more than 100,000 ubi-sites, which identifies sites regulating diverse protein functions and rationalizes genetic vulnerabilities. Finally, we employed chemical genomics to validate the functional relevance of high-scoring ubi-sites and leveraged genetic code expansion to demonstrate that ubiquitination of K320 in the RNA-regulator ELAVL1 disrupts RNA binding. Our work reveals systems-level principles of the ubiquitinome and provides a powerful resource for studying site-specific protein ubiquitination.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.