EEG Microstates Reveal Differential Network Dynamics under Constant Current and Oscillatory Brain Stimulation
Griskova-Bulanova, I.; Tarailis, P.; Zivanovic, M.; Filipovic, S.; Bjekic, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundEEG microstates are brief, quasi-stable scalp topographies that index large-scale network dynamics and may sensitively capture the net effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). ObjectiveTo evaluate differential effects of three types of tES - tDCS, tACS and oscillatory tDCS - (otDCS), on canonical EEG microstates (A-D) in healthy adults. MethodsIn a randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study, 42 participants completed four sessions (tDCS, tACS, otDCS, sham). Stimulation (20 min) used a P3-cheek montage: tDCS +1.5 mA; tACS at individualized theta frequency (ITF, 4-8 Hz), {+/-}1 mA; otDCS anodal with {+/-}0.5 mA oscillation around +1.5 mA at ITF. A five-minute resting EEG (eyes closed then eyes open) was recorded pre- and post-intervention. Microstates were extracted (A-D), back-fitted, and assessed on duration, occurrence, contribution, and mean GFP using linear mixed-effects models with sham and pre/post adjustments. ResultsFour canonical microstates explained ~80% variance with stable topographies across conditions. Modulation patterns were modality-specific. MS A (sensory/arousal) increased across all active protocols, strongest after otDCS. MS B (visual-autobiographical) was consistently suppressed, again most following otDCS. MS C (self-referential) decreased selectively after oscillatory stimulation (tACS, otDCS) only. MS D (executive/attention) diverged by waveform: enhanced by tACS and otDCS but reduced by tDCS. Across outcomes, otDCS produced the largest and most widespread effects, overlapping features of both tDCS (tonic/stabilizing) and tACS (oscillatory/entraining) influences. ConclusionsResting-state EEG microstates provide a sensitive systems-level assay of tES aftereffects. Constant and oscillatory current waveforms reorganize network states in dissociable ways, with otDCS exerting the most robust, comprehensive modulation. These findings support microstates as practical biomarkers for differentiating, optimizing, and monitoring neuromodulation strategies.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase-specific manipulation of neural oscillatory activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation 96%
- Transferability of cathodal tDCS effects from the primary motor to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a multimodal TMS-EEG study 96%
- Reduced Auditory Perception and Brain Response with Quiet TMS Coil 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of tDCS Dose and Electrode Montage on regional cerebral blood flow and motor behavior 96%
- Multimodal personalization of transcranial direct current stimulation for modulation of sensorimotor integration 95%
- Recognizing EEG responses to active TMS vs. sham stimulations in different TMS-EEG datasets: a machine learning approach 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural effects of TMS trains on the human prefrontal cortex 97%
- Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex 96%
- Reliability of resting-state EEG modulation by continuous and intermittent theta burst stimulation of the primary motor cortex: A sham-controlled study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase-synchronized 40Hz tACS and iTBS effects on gamma oscillations 97%
- Characterising the contribution of auditory and somatosensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials following stimulation of prefrontal, premotor and parietal cortex 95%
- A Double-Blind Replication Attempt of Offline 5Hz-rTUS-Induced Corticospinal Excitability 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Probing the circuits of conscious perception with magnetophosphenes 94%
- Irregular optogenetic stimulation waveforms can induce naturalistic patterns of hippocampal spectral activity 94%
- Responses of Model Cortical Neurons to Temporal Interference Stimulation and Related Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Modalities 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.