Sleep Health Behind Bars: A Global Scoping Review of Sleep in Carceral Settings
Hummel, V.; Kouka, J.; Li, P.; Grimshaw, A.; Lewis, C.-C.; Suh, E.; Paglia, G.; Michel, C.; Elumn, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundSleep is a fundamental determinant of health, yet little is known about sleep in carceral environments where structural, environmental, and psychosocial factors uniquely disrupt rest. Incarcerated individuals face disproportionately high burdens of illness, with sleep disturbances contributing to these disparities. Understanding the evidence on sleep in incarceration is essential for informing care, policy, and research. MethodsWe conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature on sleep in incarcerated populations, following the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Ten databases were searched from inception to March 2025 for studies addressing sleep among currently incarcerated individuals. Two reviewers screened and extracted data, with quality appraisal adapted from Joanna Briggs Institute tools. ResultsOf 5,518 records identified, 63 studies published between 1978 and 2025 met inclusion criteria. Most were observational (75%), cross-sectional (59%), and published after 2014, with studies conducted mostly outside the United States. Research clustered into three domains: (1) descriptions of sleep quality and insomnia; (2) sleep and health outcomes, particularly depression, anxiety, PTSD, aggression, and suicidality, with limited study of cardiometabolic risk; and (3) interventions including cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, mindfulness, yoga, and relaxation, which showed feasibility but were limited by small samples, lack of controls, or short follow-up. Objective measures were rarely used. ConclusionsEvidence demonstrates compromised sleep health in carceral settings due to psychiatric comorbidity, environmental stressors, and restricted care. Gaps remain in physical health outcomes, womens experiences, and post-release effects. Interventions tailored to carceral realities and adapted evidence-based interventions showed promise.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Two years after lockdown: longitudinal trajectories of sleep disturbances and mental health over the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of age, gender, and chronotype 94%
- The effect of sleep continuity disruption on multimodal emotion processing and regulation: a laboratory-based, randomized, controlled experiment in good sleepers 94%
- Insomnia symptoms and risk of bloodstream infections: prospective data from the prospective population-based HUNT Study, Norway 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Religiosity and Spirituality as Stressors or Stress Relievers in relation to Sleep Health among African American Women 94%
- Disseminating sleep education to graduate psychology programs online: A knowledge translation study to improve the management of insomnia 94%
- Changes of evening exposure to electronic devices during the COVID-19 lockdown affect the time course of sleep disturbances 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Specific changes in sleep oscillations after blocking human metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in the absence of altered memory function 90%
- Community-based causal evidence that high habitual caffeine consumption alters distinct polysomnography-derived sleep variables 89%
- Drug-drug interactions between classic psychedelics and psychoactive drugs: a systematic review 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of mindfulness meditation and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea with residual excessive sleepiness: A randomized controlled pilot study 95%
- Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia on subjective and objective measures of sleep and cognition 92%
- Effects of medical school on mental health and sleep habits 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.