Measuring appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in high-income countries: a rapid systematic review of indicators
Berry, R.; Catteau, L.; Caris, M. G.; de Boer, M.; Kherabi, Y.; Magrini, E.; Medioli, F.; Murri, R.; Ng, B. Y.; Peiffer-Smadja, N.; Ashiru-Oredope, D.; The ESCMID Study Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (ESGAP),
Show abstract
BackgroundAntimicrobials are essential for treating and preventing bacterial infections, yet inappropriate use drives the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), posing a major global health challenge. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) aims to optimise antibiotic use, making the definition and measurement of "appropriate" prescribing critical. ObjectivesThe primary objective was to identify indicators used to measure appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in high-income countries. The secondary objective was to describe levels of inappropriate prescribing in high-income countries. MethodsA rapid systematic review (registration no: CRD42024628584) was conducted using Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases. Eligible studies reported indicators for measuring appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in high-income countries. Each article was independently reviewed for inclusion, extracted, and assessed for risk of bias by one reviewer, with dual screening of 10%. Indicators were grouped as general or proxy indicators, further synthesised thematically, and described narratively. Quantitative data on inappropriateness for general indicators were standardised and summarised. ResultsThis rapid review identified 103 unique indicators from 165 studies: 58 general indicators from 128 studies and 45 proxy indicators from 38 studies. The most frequent general indicator was compliance with guidelines (90/128, 70%). The most common proxy indicator was rate of prescribing by indication (22/38, 58%). Indicators were applied across diverse settings, populations, and types of infection. Among studies describing general indicators, 103/128 gave quantifiable outcomes for inappropriateness of prescribing, ranging from 2% to 88%. ConclusionsThe review highlights the wide variety of indicators used to assess appropriateness of antibiotic use in high-income countries, reflecting the complexity of the concept. Most indicators focused on whether the correct antibiotic, dose, frequency, and duration was prescribed, in-line with clinical guidance and tailored to the clinical context - core principles of AMS. These findings provide a valuable resource for those aiming to monitor and improve antibiotic prescribing practices.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Criteria to Achieve Safe Antimicrobial Intravenous-to-Oral Switch in Hospitalised Adult Populations: A Systematic Rapid Review 96%
- Perceptions, views and practices regarding antibiotic prescribing and stewardship among hospital physicians in Jakarta, Indonesia 95%
- Effectiveness of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults and children: systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibiotics and hospital-associated Clostridioides difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis 2020 update 96%
- Trends in fluoroquinolone prescribing in UK primary and secondary care between 2019 and 2023 94%
- Estimating the cost of antibiotic use on future collateral resistance: a retrospective comparison of cefuroxime versus cefazolin and amoxicillin/clavulanate 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of Bacterial Coinfection and Patterns of Antibiotics Prescribing in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic review and Meta-Analysis 95%
- Clinical pattern of antibiotic overuse and misuse in primary healthcare hospitals in the southwest of China 93%
- Antimicrobial agents for the treatment of enteric fever chronic carriage: A systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factor modelling of antimicrobial resistance in cancer patients: A systematic review 94%
- Guidelines on reporting and assessing mathematical models for infectious disease dynamics: A scoping review 93%
- Indirect Benefits of Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention for Non-Malarial Pediatric Infections and Routine Antibiotic Use in Real-World Programmatic Settings: A Pre-Post Study Using Positive and Negative Controls 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Behavior-change interventions to improve antimicrobial stewardship in human health, animal health, and livestock agriculture: A systematic review 96%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 93%
- Drivers of inappropriate use of antimicrobials in South Asia: A systematic review of qualitative literature 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.