Development and Pilot testing of a Leadership Module to Support Quality Improvement Teams in Nursing Homes
Ginsburg, L.; Berta, W.; Estabrooks, C. A.; Hoben, M.; Kehler, L. R.; McLeod, D.; Pietracci, J.; Rose, L.; Saj, D.; Veldhorst, G.; Wagg, A.; Doupe, M. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundLeadership is a critical lever for supporting implementation of practice change ideas intended to improve care. We need evidence-based leadership programs to help front-line providers meaningfully implement practice change in complex care settings. Part of the SHIFT intervention, this paper describes and pilot tests a leadership program module (LeaderSHIFT) that provides training and implementation coaching to front-line leaders, as one of several integrated facilitated supports designed to help front-line care teams meaningfully enact practice change. MethodsThe LeaderSHIFT program module was developed based on empirical work, relevant facilitation and transformational leadership theories, and principles of stakeholder co-design and feasible engagement. A pilot implementation study was conducted that examined several of Proctors (2011) implementation outcomes. ResultsLeaderSHIFT includes four interactive workshops plus two one-on-one coaching sessions designed to develop capacity in four areas of implementation leadership: (1) Self-awareness, (2) Motivate and inspire, (3) Facilitate learning capacity, and (4) Support team-oriented processes. Pilot results suggest it can be successfully implemented (it was acceptable, adopted, appropriate, feasible). Fidelity (LeaderSHIFT role enactment) varied across pilot teams. ConclusionsWith a strong theoretical and empirical base, LeaderSHIFT highlights important, often overlooked, relational and socio-cultural aspects of successful implementation leadership. As such, the LeaderSHIFT program module has the potential to improve implementation of practice change interventions in nursing homes and other institutional care settings. Trial registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT03426072) on July 18, 2022. KEY MESSAGES REGARDING FEASIBILITYO_LIWhat uncertainties existed regarding the feasibility? O_LIWhile leadership is known to be a critical lever for implementation of evidence-informed practice change, there are few leadership training programs that have a relational focus designed to support broader team-based practice change initiatives; and uncertainty remains regarding implementability (feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity) of this type of leadership module in complex care settings C_LI C_LIO_LIWhat are the key feasibility findings? O_LIThe LeaderSHIFT module performed well on several key implementation outcomes (module acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness). Fidelity to implementation leadership was successful for managers who were able to enact relational aspects of the role. C_LI C_LIO_LIWhat are the implications of the feasibility findings for the design of the main study? O_LIFindings confirmed the value of one-to-one coaching for enhancing leaders relational competencies and prompted training overlap for senior and front-line leaders to ensure there is a common understanding of respective roles in intervention implementation. C_LI C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 95%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 95%
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- ‘Leading from the front’ implementation strategies increase the success of influenza vaccination drives among healthcare workers: A reanalysis of Systematic Review evidence using Intervention Component Analysis (ICA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) 93%
- The Monash Learning Health System Maturity Matrix: Codesign of a Tool to Measure and Guide Improvement in Complex Health System Behaviour 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 95%
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 95%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving the impact of pharmacy interventions in hospitals 94%
- “We tend to get pad happy” : a qualitative study of health practitioners’ perspectives on continence care for older people in hospital 93%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 94%
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 93%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.