Back

Neural Underpinnings of Olfactory Dysfunction across Parkinson's and Alzheimer's Spectra

Yang, Z.; Togo, H.; Abe, M.; Murai, T.; Kitani-Morii, F.; Kanai, K.; Oishi, N.; Parkinson's and Alzheimer's Disease Dimensional Neuroimaging Initiative (PADNI), ; Hanakawa, T.

2025-10-08 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.10.07.681050 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Olfactory dysfunction is a frequent yet understudied feature of neurodegenerative spectrum disorders, including Alzheimers disease (AD) and Parkinsons disease (PD). To disentangle the neural substrates of hyposmia across disease spectra, we examined 222 participants from the Parkinsons and Alzheimers disease Dimensional Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. Participants were classified according to the presence of cognitive disturbance, movement disorder, or both. Olfactory testing disclosed that cognitive disturbance and movement disorder were independently associated with hyposmia, and having both cognitive disturbance and movement disorder was associated with severe hyposmia. Whole-brain voxel-based morphometry revealed that hyposmia was associated with atrophy in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) in individuals with cognitive disturbance, whereas an artificial intelligence-based segmentation model identified olfactory bulb atrophy in those with movement disorder. Regression analysis and structural equation modeling further confirmed that the MTL and olfactory bulb volume contributed to olfactory performance through distinct processes. Individuals with cognitive disturbance and movement disorder had atrophy in both the MTL and olfactory bulb ("double hit"). We identified dual processes underlying hyposmia in the AD and PD spectra: a process linking MTL degeneration to cognitive disturbance and a process linking olfactory bulb degeneration to movement disorder. Our transdiagnostic approach enhances strategy in identifying specific neural correlates underlying hyposmia, lending support to the development of biomarkers for early intervention in AD and PD.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.