Advancing coupled behavioural-epidemic models: An interdisciplinary framework for the collection of empirical data
Offeddu, V.; Colosi, E.; Lucchini, L.; Leone, L. P.; Chiavenna, C.; Balsamo, D.; D'Agnese, E.; Bonacina, F.; Cucciniello, M.; Trentini, F.; Aleta, A.; Manfredi, P.; Moreno, Y.; Karsai, M.; Colizza, V.; Koltai, J.; Melegaro, A.
Show abstract
Infection control requires integrating behavioural dynamics into epidemic models. However, models often overlook behavioural complexity due to limited empirical data. We adopted an interdisciplinary approach to develop a modelling-oriented behavioural dataset. We applied the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) framework to assess COVID-19 vaccination behaviour from 22,228 survey responses across six European countries (March-July 2024). We examined how willingness to vaccinate aligned with uptake and timeliness, and traced country-specific temporal changes in perceived COVID-19 severity and willingness. To capture peer-driven opinion formation, we introduced a novel indicator - discussion contacts - measuring interactions on relevant topics. Willingness correlated with both uptake and timeliness, yet 6-18% of initially unwilling respondents ultimately received [≥]2 doses. Lower willingness was associated with a 2.0-month vaccination delay. Perceived severity and willingness to vaccinate declined throughout the pandemic. Behavioural indicators systematically varied by vaccination status, particularly in the Motivation domain. Daily discussion contacts followed the patterns of in-person contacts, ranging from 1.4-2.9 for adults <60 years to 0.5-1.2 for those [≥]60 years. This dataset offers theory-informed and time-sensitive inputs to support the development of more realistic and policy-relevant behavioural-epidemic models.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Number of COVID-19 hospitalisations averted by vaccination: Estimates for the Netherlands, January 6, 2021 through August 30, 2022 95%
- Worldwide routine immunisation coverage regressed during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Impact of CoronaVac on Covid-19 outcomes of elderly adults in a large and socially unequal Brazilian city: A target trial emulation study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adherence and sustainability of interventions informing optimal control against COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Spatial analysis of COVID-19 booster vaccine uptake in Scotland, and projection of future distributions 94%
- High coverage COVID-19 mRNA vaccination rapidly controls SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Long-Term Care Facilities 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Controlling the pandemic during the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rollout: a modeling study 94%
- Persistent humoral immunity in children and adolescents throughout the COVID-19 pandemic (June 2020 to July 2022): a prospective school-based cohort study (Ciao Corona) in Switzerland 94%
- Possible future waves of SARS-CoV-2 infection generated by variants of concern with a range of characteristics 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of uncertainty and unwillingness to receive the COVID-19 booster vaccine: an observational study of 22,139 fully vaccinated adults in the UK 94%
- Dosing interval strategies for two-dose COVID-19 vaccination in 13 low- and middle-income countries of Europe: health impact modelling and benefit-risk analysis 93%
- Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in UK school-aged children and young people decreases infection rates and reduces COVID-19 symptoms 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- mRNA vaccines effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths in older adults: a cohort study based on data-linkage of national health registries in Portugal 94%
- Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 transmission to household contacts during dominance of Delta variant (B.1.617.2), August-September 2021, the Netherlands 94%
- Contact behaviour before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: evidence from contact surveys in 2016-2017 and 2020-2023 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.