Double Trouble - The prevalence of concomitant traumatic brain injury in patients with spinal cord injury and its impact on functional outcomes: a systematic review.
Skein, K.; George, R.; O'Hare Doig, R. L.; Corrigan, F.; Leonard, A. V.
Show abstract
Study designSystematic review ObjectivesTo examine the prevalence, diagnostic challenges, and functional impact of concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI) in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). MethodsPubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were searched with a search strategy containing key search terms for TBI, SCI and concomitant injury. Original research articles reporting on prevalence and/or functional outcomes following a TBI at the time of SCI in adult populations were included. ResultsForty studies met the inclusion criteria, with 32 reporting prevalence and 18 information on functional outcomes. Reported prevalence rates of concomitant TBI varied widely (10-75%) across studies, largely due to inconsistent diagnostic criteria, retrospective data collection, and reliance on incomplete medical records or ICD coding. The identification of mild TBI (mTBI) was particularly problematic, with differing diagnostic criteria employed.. Moderate-severe TBI at the time of SCI significantly increased in-hospital mortality and complications like pneumonia, sepsis, but had minimal effects on rehabilitation trajectory. Functional outcomes, particularly motor and sensory recovery, were generally unaffected by concomitant injury, though subtle cognitive deficits were observed in moderate to severe TBI cases during rehabilitation. Few studies examined outcomes beyond one year post injury. ConclusionOverall, current evidence suggests that concomitant TBI is common in people presenting with an SCI, but its long term functional and cognitive impact remains underexplored. Future research should employ standardised diagnostic criteria, prospective data collection, and long term follow up to clarify the role of concomitant TBI not only in the acute recovery phase, but also chronically.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Natural Progression of Routine Laboratory Markers following Spinal Trauma: A Longitudinal, Multi-Cohort Study 94%
- Comparison of common outcome measures for assessing independence in patients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study 94%
- Mortality and outcomes after decompressive craniectomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter abnormalities characterise the acute stage of sports-related mild Traumatic Brain Injury 92%
- Repetitive subconcussion results in disrupted neural activity independent of concussion history 90%
- Distinct clinical phenotypes and their neuroanatomic correlates in chronic traumatic brain injury 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal Assessment of Glymphatic Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Insights from PVS burden and DTI-ALPS Imaging 93%
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 92%
- Atypical somatic symptoms in adults with prolonged recovery from mild traumatic brain injury 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Serum fibrinogen level and fibrinogen administration in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol 94%
- Community Support for Injured Patients: A Scoping Review and Narrative Synthesis 93%
- Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.