Identifying tissue states by spatial protein patterns related to chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer
Luque, L. M.; Khan, M. A.; Torrisi, G.; Green, T. D.; Hardman, D.; Owczarek, C.; Phillips, T. A.; Marks, D. S.; Parsons, M.; Sander, C.; Schumacher, L. J.
Show abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive malignancy with limited targeted therapies and variable responses to conventional chemotherapy, influenced by intratumoral heterogeneity and complex tumor microenvironment (TME) interactions. Understanding spatiotemporal cellular interplay and tissue organization is crucial for advancing tumor biology and improving patient stratification. Spatially resolved proteomics, such as Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC), offers a powerful approach to dissect the TME. We present an end-to-end computational pipeline for robust quantitative analysis of large-scale IMC datasets, addressing the challenge of batch effects through image-level contrast adjustment. Applying this framework to 813 tissue regions encompassing over 4 million cells from 63 TNBC patients, we revealed distinct spatial arrangements of cell types between chemotherapy responders and non-responders. Non-responders showed reduced cytotoxic T-cell infiltration into tumor regions and increased spatial co-localization between fibroblasts and macrophages, a pattern that persisted and intensified after chemotherapy treatment. To integrate these complex spatial-molecular relationships, we used graph neural networks (GNNs) to predict treatment response from pre-treatment samples with AUROC=0.71. Interpretability analysis identified B7H4, CD11b, CD366, and FOXP3 as the most predictive protein markers, with fibroblasts, cancer cells, and CD8+ T cells being the most informative cell types. This study introduces a scalable analytical framework for spatial proteomics with interpretable predictions, suggesting features of tissue state that could guide treatment decisions in TNBC and further our understanding of the spatial determinants of therapeutic response.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ROSIE: AI generation of multiplex immunofluorescence staining from histopathology images 96%
- stLearn: integrating spatial location, tissue morphology and gene expression to find cell types, cell-cell interactions and spatial trajectories within undissociated tissues 95%
- Learning tissue representation by identification of persistent local patterns in spatial omics data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Robust estimation of cancer and immune cell-type proportions from bulk tumor ATAC-Seq data. 94%
- MGPfactXMBD: A Model-Based Factorization Method for scRNA Data Unveils Bifurcating Transcriptional Modules Underlying Cell Fate Determination 94%
- DUX4 is a common driver of immune evasion and immunotherapy failure in metastatic cancers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary states and trajectories characterized by distinct pathways stratify ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma patients 95%
- Pan-cancer proteomic map of 949 human cell lines reveals principles of cancer vulnerabilities 94%
- Clinical and molecular features of acquired resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- KDML: a machine-learning framework for inference of multi-scale gene functions from genetic perturbation screens 95%
- Explainable Machine Learning Identifies Dosage Compensation Factors in Aneuploid Human Cancer Cells 95%
- Pan-Cancer landscape of protein activities identifies drivers of signalling dysregulation and patient survival 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.