Rapidly Reconfigurable Dynamic Computing in Neural Networks with Fixed Synaptic Connectivity
Mason, K.; Sennik, S.; Clopath, C.; Gruber, A.; Nicola, W.
Show abstract
Learning and memory in the brains neocortex have long been hypothesised to be primarily mediated by synaptic plasticity. Extensive research in artificial neural networks has shown that training networks by adjusting connection weights faces computational challenges, including large parameter spaces and the tendency of new learning to interfere with previous learning (catastrophic forgetting). We propose that the brain, which is resistant to these challenges, can also learn by modulating the excitability of each neuron in a network rather than changing synaptic strengths. We show here that learning a task-specific set of bias currents enables a feedforward or recurrent network with fixed and randomly assigned connections to perform well on and switch between dozens of tasks, including regression, classification, autonomous time series generation, a game and robotic control. Bias-only learning also provides a novel mechanistic explanation for representational drift. It directly links the noise robustness of neuronal representations on short and long time scales to the ability of neural circuits to preserve learned information while remaining adaptable. We postulate that subcortical structures, such as the basal ganglia or cerebellum, may provide similar bias inputs to the neocortex for rapid task learning and robustness against interference.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Inductive biases of neural specialization in spatial navigation 97%
- Anatomical and neurophysiological data on primary visual cortex suffice for reproducing brain-like robust multiplexing of visual function 97%
- Neural Heterogeneity Enhances Reliable Neural information Processing: Local Sensitivity and Globally Input-slaved Transient Dynamics 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.