The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Health Economy, Workforce Productivity, and Administrative Efficiency: A Systematic Review
Lee, J. T.; Liu, V. T. N.; Ali, S.; Chen, P.-C.; Lee, C.-C.; Huang, C.-W.; Li, V. C.-S.; Chen, H.-H.; Duh, W.-J.; Marthias, T.; Atun, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundHealthcare systems globally are under increasing financial and operational strain due to aging populations, rising expenditures, and workforce shortages. Amid these challenges, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool to enhance system-level performance, particularly in cost reduction, productivity gains, and administrative efficiency. ObjectiveThis review aims to synthesize existing evidence on the macro and system-level impact of AI implementation across three key domains: the health economy, workforce productivity, and administrative efficiency. MethodsA systematic review methodology was employed, allowing for the integration of diverse data sources and study types. Literature was systematically identified through PubMed and Google, covering publications from 2020 to July 2025. Studies were included if they evaluated AIs impact on national or regional health expenditure, labor restructuring, or process efficiency. Thematic synthesis was guided by a conceptual framework modeling AI as a system-wide catalyst. ResultsTwenty-four studies were included. AI implementation demonstrated potential cost savings of 5-10% in national health expenditures, driven by automation in hospital operations and administrative processes. AI-supported interventions reduced diagnostic time by up to 90% and treatment costs by over 30% in specific applications, such as cancer diagnosis and radiotherapy. Administrative tools, including AI-assisted documentation and claims processing, achieved efficiency gains of up to 40%. However, reliance on simulated models, short-term studies, and single-center data limits generalizability. ConclusionsAI presents significant potential to enhance health system efficiency and reduce costs. Real-world implementation studies, standardized outcome metrics, and robust governance frameworks are essential to validate these gains and ensure equitable, sustainable adoption.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Simulated Misuse of Large Language Models and Clinical Credit Systems 95%
- The clinician-AI interface: intended use and explainability in FDA-cleared AI devices for medical image interpretation 93%
- Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support: referral, triage, and diagnosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cracking the Code: A Scoping Review to Unite Disciplines in Tackling Legal Issues in Health Artificial Intelligence 92%
- Natural Language Word-Embeddings as a glimpse into healthcare at the End Of Life 91%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large Language Models Improve the Identification of Emergency Department Visits for Symptomatic Kidney Stones 91%
- Using explainable machine learning to identify patients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments 91%
- Evaluation of Domain Generalization and Adaptation on Improving Model Robustness to Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models 93%
- Diagnostic Codes in AI prediction models and Label Leakage of Same-admission Clinical Outcomes 90%
- Crowdfunding Medical Care: A Comparison of Online Medical Fundraising in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 94%
- Diversity and inclusion: A hidden additional benefit of Open Data 91%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.