Return of the GEDAI: Unsupervised EEG Denoising based on Leadfield Filtering
Ros, T.; Ferat, V.; Huang, Y.; Colangelo, C.; Kia, S. M.; Wolfers, T.; Vulliemoz, S.; Michela, A.
Show abstract
Current electroencephalogram (EEG) denoising methods struggle to remove the complex physiological and environmental artifacts typical of real-world settings, which both hinders the isolation of true neural activity and limits the technologys translational potential. We present the Generalized Eigenvalue De-Artifacting Instrument (GEDAI), a novel algorithm for denoising highly contaminated EEG. GEDAI employs leadfield filtering to selectively remove noise and artifacts that diverge from a theoretically defined EEG forward model. This approach offers unique advantages over existing solutions, including 1) denoising of highly corrupt recordings without "clean" reference data, 2) single-step correction of artifactual epochs and bad channels, 3) unsupervised detection of brain and noise components based on the signal and noise subspace alignment index (SENSAI). In ground-truth simulations with synthetic and empirical EEG contaminated with realistic artifacts (EOG, EMG, noise), GEDAI globally outperformed leading denoising techniques based on principal component analysis (ASR) and independent component analysis (IClabel, MARA), revealing large effect sizes in challenging scenarios with simultaneous artifact mixtures, low signal-to-noise ratio (-9 dB), and high temporal contamination (up to 100%). Its superior denoising also enhanced neurobehavioral predictions, yielding highest accuracies in ERP classification and brain fingerprinting. GEDAIs autonomy, computational speed and noise-resilience could find future applications in 1) real- world medical, mobile and dry electrode EEG recordings 2) magnetoenecephalography (MEG) denoising (given the shared M/EEG forward model), and 3) real-time brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). The Matlab code for GEDAI is available as an open-source EEGLAB plugin at https://github.com/neurotuning/GEDAI-master
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven spatial filtering for improved measurement of cortical tracking of multiple representations of speech 96%
- Beyond Linear Neural Envelope Tracking: A Mutual Information Approach 96%
- Sensorimotor brain-computer interface performance depends on signal-to-noise ratio but not connectivity of the mu rhythm in a multiverse analysis of longitudinal data 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Source Localization Using Recursively Applied and Projected MUSIC with Flexible Extent Estimation 96%
- Spatial (Mis)match Between EEG and fMRI Signal Patterns Revealed by Spatio-Spectral Source-Space EEG Decomposition 96%
- Decoding continuous variables from event-related potential (ERP) data with linear support vector regression (SVR) using the Decision Decoding Toolbox (DDTBOX) 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.