Back

Probe-Based Identification of Metal-Binding Sites Using Deep Learning Representations

Xu, S.; Onoda, A.

2025-10-06 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.10.04.680417 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Metalloproteins play indispensable roles in a multitude of cellular processes. They incorporate metal ions as vital cofactors to catalyze biochemical reactions, stabilize protein structures, and mediate electron transfer. Given their prevalence and importance, identifying metal-binding sites within proteins remains a challenging task, due to the intricate complexity of the protein environments and the promiscuous binding behavior of metal ions. Although computational approaches for predicting metal-binding sites have been developed for decades, their performance often suffers from limited accuracy due to constrained methodologies and data scarcity. Here, we introduce PRIME, a hybrid deep learning framework that harnesses both evolutionary and structural signals to predict metal-binding sites with high accuracy and efficiency. PRIME employs protein language models (PLMs) and pre-trained structure models (PSMs), following the paradigm of deep representation learning, to extract essential information of protein sequences and structures. PRIME integrates a novel probe generation algorithm that bridges sequence- and structure-based predictions by efficiently scanning candidate binding sites. The resulting framework achieves superior accuracy across a wide range of metal ions, including both abundant ions such as Zn2+ and Ca2+ and less abundant ions such as K+ and Na+, surpassing the performance of existing methods. In addition, ablation analysis shows that PSMs significantly enhance the accuracy of metal-binding site prediction. Case studies on AlphaFold2 models, along with the high prediction speed of PRIME, further demonstrate its potential for high-throughput applications in metalloproteomics.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.