Back

Cat_Wiz: A stereochemistry-guided toolkit for locating, diagnosing and annotating Mg2+ ions in RNA structures.

Naleem, N.; Henning-Knechtel, A.; Kirmizialtin, S.; Auffinger, P.

2025-10-04 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.10.04.677962 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Misassigned Mg2+ ions are pervasive in RNA structural databases, obscuring mechanistic interpretation, undermining comparative analyses and compromising machine-learning training sets. Here, we present Cat_Wiz, a Coot-integrated, stereochemistry guided toolkit that facilitates the localization, diagnosis, correction and annotation of Mg2+ binding sites. Cat_Wiz comprises three modules: MG_diagnosis which validates and regularizes existing assignments; MG_detect which identifies unmodelled ion binding sites; and MG_clamp which classifies recurrent Mg2+ clamp motifs. Cat_Wiz also includes a complete binding site annotation system. The stereochemical principles implemented in Cat_Wiz were derived from an earlier analysis of the 1.55 [A] resolution Escherichia coli ribosome and from surveys of the Cambridge Structural Database. These principles provide a robust experimental foundation for characterizing Mg2+ binding sites. Applications to ribosomes, hammerhead ribozymes, group I introns, and quaternary RNA assemblies demonstrate that Cat_Wiz rapidly locates overlooked ions, corrects misassignments, and improves stereochemical fidelity in hours rather than days. Beyond refinement, Cat_Wiz generates curated data that can seed diverse machine-learning and AI models. This transparent, cost-effective framework establishes reproducible standards for RNA-ion assignments and will drive progress in the design of RNA 3D architectures through the identification of unique Mg2+-dependent backbone folds. Cat_Wiz is also applicable to Mg2+ binding sites in proteins and all related biomolecular systems since it is based on universal stereochemical principles.

Published in Nucleic Acids Research (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.