Sociality and nesting strategy shape the bimodal diversity gradient in bees
Heinrich, L. R.; Martins, A. C.; Bossert, S.; Hughes, A. C.; Orr, M. C.; Seltmann, K. C.; Swain, A.; Vasconcelos, T.
Show abstract
Bees are dominant pollinators across native and agricultural plant communities, yet the drivers of their patterns of geographic distribution and functional diversity remain poorly understood. Notably, bees exhibit a bimodal latitudinal diversity gradient, peaking in species diversity in temperate and arid regions rather than the tropics despite their close ecological and evolutionary ties to flowering plants, which show the opposite pattern. Here, we investigated whether two key life history traits thought to shape where bees can live--sociality and nesting strategy--may influence this pattern. We compiled data on sociality and nesting strategy for 4,293 bee species and combined it with a comprehensive phylogeny, curated global occurrence records, and newly-developed models of trait evolution to test 1) whether sociality and nesting biology are evolutionarily correlated, 2) how these life history traits shape bees climatic niches and niche breadths, and 3) whether the evolutionary dynamics of these traits may explain the bimodal latitudinal gradient in bee diversity. We find that the evolution of above-ground nesting is closely tied to the evolution of social behavior, but this trait combination has evolved rarely across the evolutionary history of bees. Where this combination does arise, species that are both social and above-ground nesters tend to have narrower climatic niches and are associated with environments that are warmer, wetter, and experience little seasonal temperature variation, making them more prevalent in tropical bee communities. Together, our results indicate that the bimodal diversity gradient in bees is driven by phylogenetic niche conservatism, where most bee lineages retain ancestral traits suited to arid environments and the derived syndrome necessary for thriving in the tropics evolves rarely.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multilevel selection on individual and group social behaviour in the wild 93%
- Phylogenomics recovers multiple origins of portable case-making in caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera), the world's most common underwater architects 93%
- The correlated evolution of foraging mode and reproductive output in lizards 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A genomic and morphometric analysis of alpine bumblebees: ongoing reductions in tongue length but no clear genetic component 93%
- The Pleistocene species pump past its prime: evidence from European butterfly sister species 93%
- Delimiting the cryptic diversity and host preferences of Sycophila parasitoid wasps associated with oak galls using phylogenomic data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Seasonal environments drive convergent evolution of a faster pace-of-life in tropical butterflies 95%
- The latitudinal gradient in rates of evolution for bird beaks, a species interaction trait 94%
- A global analysis of song frequency in passerines provides no support for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis but suggests a role for sexual selection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.