Back

Disentangling the importance of microbiological and physicochemical properties of Ethiopian field soils for the Striga seed bank and sorghum infestations

Taylor, T.; Benti, G.; Fernandes Alves Leite, M.; Etalo, D.; Lombard, L.; AriasGiraldo, L.-M.; Ryba, D.; Sanow, S.; Mostert, T.; Martinez de la Parte, E.; Macia-Vicente, J.; Yimer, D.; Tsega, U.; Daska, J.; van Doorn, R.; Rosa Leite, R.; Tessema, T.; Crous, P. W.; Kuramae, E.; Raajimakers, J.; Brady, S.

2025-10-04 plant biology
10.1101/2025.10.03.680328 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Striga hermonthica (Striga) is a parasitic weed that severely affects sorghum yields in sub-Saharan Africa. Recent studies highlighted the soil microbiomes potential to suppress Striga through interference with specific stages in its life cycle. In this study, meta-analysis of 48 Ethiopian field soils revealed that microbial communities and their interactions with soil physico-chemical properties correlated with Striga field occurrence. Striga infestation of sorghum and soil seedbank levels were negatively correlated with clay content and the nutrients potassium, sulfur, calcium, and carbon. Microbiome analyses indicated that fungal communities were more responsive than bacteria to changes in Striga infestation and seedbank levels, with distinct microbial compositions even in soils where Striga was not detected. Specific fungal and bacterial genera showed both positive and negative correlations with Striga measures, but patterns rarely held across taxonomic levels, highlighting the complexity of microbiome-Striga interactions. To begin to validate these correlations, we tested an isolate from the fungal genus Neocosmospora, which negatively correlated with the Striga seedbank, and showed that this isolate promotes Striga seed germination in vitro, suggesting potential for biological control of Striga. The data and analysis methods are integrated and shared in a public Shiny App for broader analysis and continued research on soil-Striga interactions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.0%
3
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.4%
5
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.1%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
8
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
9
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
10
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
Phytobiomes Journal
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
12
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
14
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
16
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Microbial Ecology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
25
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
27
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
30
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%