Back

Neural signatures of harm aversion predict later willingness to exert effort for others rewards

Contreras-Huerta, L. S.; Yu, H.; Prosser, A. M. B.; Lockwood, P. L.; Rojas-Thomas, F.; Crockett, M. J.; Apps, M. A. J.

2025-10-04 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.10.03.680267 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Prosocial behaviours--actions that incur personal costs to benefit others--are central to human social life. Two key domains are moral harm aversion, where individuals forgo personal gains to prevent harming others, and prosocial effort, which involves exerting effort to benefit others. Although previous studies suggest a relationship between these behaviours, it remains unclear whether neural responses in one domain can predict prosocial motivation in another. Here, we tested whether neural sensitivity to morally salient information in harm aversion could predict prosocial effort later. Participants completed two tasks: a harm aversion task during fMRI, in which they traded off monetary profit against delivering electric shocks to another person; and, one week later, a prosocial effort task outside the scanner, in which they decided whether rewards for others were worth the required physical effort. We focused on three regions implicated in cost-benefit decision-making and social cognition: the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), anterior insula (AI), and temporoparietal junction (TPJ). Behaviourally, greater harm aversion was associated with increased prosocial effort. Neurally, AI responses to others harm predicted sensitivity to others rewards in the effort task, consistent with a role in representing others outcomes across positive and negative valences. By contrast, TPJ responses to profit from harming others predicted decreased sensitivity to others rewards, suggesting a role in context-dependent valuation that may constrain prosocial behaviour. These findings demonstrate that neural responses to morally salient information in one context correlate with prosocial motivation in another, highlighting mechanisms that bridge moral sensitivity and effortful prosociality.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
18.2%
2
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.9%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.9%
5
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.2%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
8
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
10
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
11
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%