Back

Towards Human Inverse Dynamics from Real Images: A Dataset and Benchmark for Joint Torque Estimation

Chen, C.; Su, W.

2025-11-11 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.10.03.679772 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWHuman inverse dynamics is an important technique for analyzing human motion. Previous studies have typically estimated joint torques from joint pose images, marker coordinates, or EMG signals, which severely limit their applicability in real-world scenarios. In this work, we aim to directly predict joint torques during human movements from real human images. To address this gap, we present the vision-based inverse dynamics dataset (VID), the first dataset tailored for the joint torque prediction from real human images. VID comprises 63,369 frames of synchronized monocular images, kinematic data, and dynamic data of real human subjects. All data are carefully synchronized, refined, and manually validated to ensure high quality. In addition, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark for the vision-based inverse dynamics of real human images, consisting of a new baseline method and a new evaluation criteria with three levels of difficulty: (i) overall joint torque estimation, (ii) joint-specific analysis, and (iii) action-specific prediction. We further compare the baseline result of our VID-Network with other representative approaches, our baseline method achieves the state-of-the-art performance on almost all the evaluation criteria. By releasing VID and the accompanying evaluation protocol, we aim to establish a foundation for advancing biomechanics from real human images and to facilitate the exploration of new approaches for human inverse dynamics in unconstrained environments. The project website is https://github.com/MedVisionKitchen/VID-Benchmark.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.