Back

NMR metabolomic profiles in white British and British Indian vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the UK Biobank

Wang, Q. J.; Schmidt, J. A.; Key, T. J.; Bragg, F. J.; Aguilar-Ramirez, D.; Viallon, V.; Travis, R. C.; Tong, T. Y.

2025-10-05 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.10.03.25337243 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe human metabolome is influenced by diet, and studying circulating metabolites may help clarify underlying mechanisms linking diet groups and disease outcomes, but few large studies have been conducted. This study investigated differences in plasma metabolites across diet groups in the UK Biobank. MethodsThe UK Biobank recruited 500,000 adults (aged 40-69) across the UK in 2006-2010. At recruitment, participants reported ethnicity and diet, from which we defined six diet groups in white British participants (regular meat eaters, low meat eaters, poultry eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians, vegans) and two in British Indian participants (meat eaters, vegetarians). Metabolomics profiling (249 plasma metabolites) was performed using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in a random subset of [~]275,000 participants. We used multivariable-adjusted linear regression to estimate differences in adjusted geometric means of metabolite levels by diet group. ResultsSignificant differences between diet groups were observed in 241 (97%) metabolites in white British participants after multiple testing correction. Compared with regular meat eaters, vegetarians and vegans had lower concentrations of n-3, DHA, and their ratios to total fatty acids. However, they had higher n-6, linoleic acid, and their ratios to n-3 and total fatty acids. Additionally, non-meat eaters had higher glycine but lower branched-chain amino acid concentrations. Large differences were also seen in many lipoprotein subclasses. Similar patterns were observed in British Indian participants. ConclusionsMarked differences in metabolite profiles across diet groups signify variations in fatty acid, amino acid, and lipid intake and metabolism, which may help explain associations with long-term health outcomes. HighlightsO_LIPeople on different diets showed substantial differences in metabolomic profiles. C_LIO_LILargest differences were seen in several fatty acids and their ratios. C_LIO_LISimilar patterns were found in white British and British Indian populations. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
3
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
8
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
11
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
13
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
25
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%