Back

Mapping Chemical-Gene Interactions for Developmental Lethality and Pregnancy Loss

Bukhari, S. H.; Nagasuri, A.; Oskotsky, B.; Arnaout, L.; Minkovski, P.; Correia, G. D. S.; MacIntyre, D. A.; Shaw, G. M.; Stevenson, D. K.; Lathi, R. B.; Yatsenko, S. A.; Oskotsky, T. T.; Rajkovic, A.; Sirota, M.

2025-10-07 health informatics
10.1101/2025.10.03.25337209 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposePregnancy loss affects 10-15% of clinically recognized pregnancies and is driven by genetic and environmental factors. Interactions between genes and chemicals critically shape developmental outcomes, yet existing resources do not organize chemical-gene evidence by gestational timing, maternal-fetal compartment, or lethality context. MethodsTo minimize this gap, we merged Intolerome genes and the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database databases to create a filtered network of 928 lethality-associated genes and [~]4,000 chemicals. We developed the Chemical-Gene Atlas (CGA) application, which analyzes chemical-gene interactions using four filters supporting hypothesis generation and clinical translation. ResultsUsing recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) as a case study, CGA identified five clinically important genes (F5, F2, AURKB, PADI6, and FOXD1) demonstrating different exposomic patterns with Bisphenol A (BPA) and Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P). These exposures affect gene expression, methylation, and coagulation pathways and placental function. Our findings demonstrate that genes with loss-of-function intolerance, especially those expressed in metabolic and cardiovascular systems, are susceptible to environmental disruption during critical windows of development, including implantation, placental development, and early organogenesis. ConclusionThe CGA platform provides a scalable model to investigate chemical-gene interactions leading to developmental lethality. CGA is available at https://cgatlas.org/.

Published in Next Research · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.