Back

Fatal consequences of feline coronavirus infection are associated with virus persistence and a distinct adaptive immune repertoire

Hiron, T. K.; Falcone, S.; The MASCOT Consortium, ; Kipar, A.; Hezzell, M. J.; O'Callaghan, C. A.; Barker, E. N.; Davison, L. J.

2025-10-03 immunology
10.1101/2025.10.02.679983 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The pathogenesis of feline infectious peritonitis (FIP), arising in a minority of cats infected with feline coronavirus (FCoV), is complex and incompletely understood. Without extended use of direct-acting antivirals FIP is invariably fatal, but there is potential for the emergence of anti-viral resistance. To understand host and viral factors associated with FIP, multiple tissues from cats with and without FIP were subjected to RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and targeted sequencing of the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire was conducted for mesenteric lymph nodes in a larger cohort. Samples from cats with FIP demonstrated higher expression of genes involved in type I interferon and proinflammatory cytokine signalling, as well as the adaptive immune response, and expression of these genes was highly correlated with FCoV abundance. Analysis of FCoV genomic variation across tissues revealed dynamic within-host evolution of FCoV, and identified distinct mutations associated with systemic virus spread both within and among cats. Assembly of TCR and B-cell receptor (BCR) sequences identified changes in the immune repertoire associated with FIP, highlighting the polyclonality and ineffectiveness of the immune response to FCoV in cats with FIP, and revealing the presence of potentially protective TCR clonotypes in cats without FIP. Together, these results represent the first analysis of immune repertoire in any feline infectious disease and demonstrate naturally occurring within-host evolution of FCoV. These novel insights into a life-threatening systemic coronaviral disease have the potential to transform therapeutic approaches in FIP.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.