Back

Suppressing cortical glutamatergic neurons produces paradoxical interictal discharges and seizures

Wu, S.; Zhou, Q.; Ryu, J.; Li, G.; Iyer, A.; Gill, B.; Ma, H.; Fang, H.; Schevon, C.; Schwartz, T. H.; Liou, J.-y.

2025-10-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.10.02.676593 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionSeizures are traditionally attributed to excessive excitation or deficient inhibition, yet recent clinical and slice data show they can also paradoxically arise when inhibition outweighs excitation. We chemogenetically suppressed neocortical glutamatergic neurons to test whether such suppression elicits epileptic activity in vivo. MethodsCaMKII-driven Gi-coupled hM4Di or Gq-coupled hM3Dq Designer Receptor Exclusively Activated by Designer Drug (DREADDs) were expressed in cortical glutamatergic neurons of Rasgrf2-jGCaMP8m and wildtype C57BL/6J mice. Widefield calcium imaging and 32-channel transparent electrocorticography were performed before and after systemic clozapine-N-oxide (CNO; 1.25-5 mg kg {superscript 1}). ResultsDREADD activation induced intermittent, large-amplitude, synchronized calcium transients confined to the CaMKII-hM4Di focus, accompanied by focal ECoG spikes that persisted for >3 h and sometimes evolved into seizures. By contrast, CNO activation of excitatory neurons via CaMKII-hM3Dq DREADDs desynchronized activity without epileptiform discharges. The same process duplicated in wild-type animals provoked similar epileptiform discharges. ConclusionSelective suppression of excitation can paradoxically drive cortical networks into hypersynchronous, epileptic states, challenging the simple excess-excitation model of ictogenesis. These findings highlight that seizures may result from relative inhibitory dominance, and that considering this excess inhibition mechanism could inspire new therapeutic approaches.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.