Back

Treatment Preferences For Comorbid Obesity and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (PRO-CON OSA) Survey: Patient and Provider Preferences for CPAP and/or Tirzepatide

Schmickl, C. N.; Tripipitsiriwat, A.; Mokhlesi, B.; Mallampalli, M.; Nokes, B.; Kundel, V.; Page, K.; Finch, C.; Donovan, L.; Tadros, M.; Aysola, R. S.; Zinchuk, A.; Zvenyach, T.; Safwan Badr, M. S.; Patel, S. R.; Orr, J. E.; Owens, R. L.; Lindsell, C.; Martin, J. L.; Malhotra, A.

2025-10-05 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2025.10.02.25337176 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeApproximately one of ten US adults has comorbid obesity and obstructive sleep apnea (COBOSA). Traditionally, sleep medicine management of COBOSA focused on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Recently, tirzepatide (a once-weekly injection) was approved for COBOSA after demonstrating substantial reduction of weight and OSA severity in efficacy trials. We assessed patient and provider attitudes towards these therapies for COBOSA. MethodsWe conducted an online survey (November 2024-August 2025) targeting US adults with OSA and/or obesity ("patients") and sleep medicine providers. The survey assessed treatment acceptability, preferences, and informational needs. ResultsThe main analysis included 461 patients (86% with sleep apnea diagnosis, 49% with COBOSA) and 114 providers. Overall, 70% of respondents found both CPAP and tirzepatide at least somewhat acceptable, with significantly different response patterns (P<.001): providers found CPAP more acceptable than tirzepatide, whereas patients rated both therapies similar. When asked to choose a preferred long-term therapy assuming equal effectiveness, patients favored tirzepatide (48% vs 21%), while providers preferred CPAP (52% vs 27%). Providers with experience prescribing injectable weight-loss medications were more aligned with patient views. Both groups supported combination therapy, though patients were less enthusiastic than providers (61% vs 86%). Both groups valued a wide range of outcomes for decision making--across symptom, sleep, and cardiometabolic health domains--and emphasized the importance of safety, long-term data, and costs. ConclusionsPatients and providers view CPAP and/or tirzepatide as acceptable options for COBOSA, but preferences diverge. Given equipoise, comparative effectiveness trials are urgently needed to guide individualized treatment strategies. BRIEF SUMMARYO_ST_ABSCurrent Knowledge/Study RationaleC_ST_ABSThe weight-loss medication tirzepatide has recently emerged as a potential treatment option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and comorbid obesity (COBOSA), but little is known about patient and provider attitudes toward this therapy compared with the current first-line treatment of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or what information they need to make informed choices between these options. Study ImpactThis survey demonstrates high levels of acceptability for both tirzepatide and CPAP, supporting clinical equipoise. It also highlights the priorities, concerns, and decision-making factors most relevant to patients and providers, providing a foundation for future comparative trials and implementation efforts that are aligned with stakeholder needs and preferences.

Published in Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.