Treatment Preferences For Comorbid Obesity and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (PRO-CON OSA) Survey: Patient and Provider Preferences for CPAP and/or Tirzepatide
Schmickl, C. N.; Tripipitsiriwat, A.; Mokhlesi, B.; Mallampalli, M.; Nokes, B.; Kundel, V.; Page, K.; Finch, C.; Donovan, L.; Tadros, M.; Aysola, R. S.; Zinchuk, A.; Zvenyach, T.; Safwan Badr, M. S.; Patel, S. R.; Orr, J. E.; Owens, R. L.; Lindsell, C.; Martin, J. L.; Malhotra, A.
Show abstract
PurposeApproximately one of ten US adults has comorbid obesity and obstructive sleep apnea (COBOSA). Traditionally, sleep medicine management of COBOSA focused on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Recently, tirzepatide (a once-weekly injection) was approved for COBOSA after demonstrating substantial reduction of weight and OSA severity in efficacy trials. We assessed patient and provider attitudes towards these therapies for COBOSA. MethodsWe conducted an online survey (November 2024-August 2025) targeting US adults with OSA and/or obesity ("patients") and sleep medicine providers. The survey assessed treatment acceptability, preferences, and informational needs. ResultsThe main analysis included 461 patients (86% with sleep apnea diagnosis, 49% with COBOSA) and 114 providers. Overall, 70% of respondents found both CPAP and tirzepatide at least somewhat acceptable, with significantly different response patterns (P<.001): providers found CPAP more acceptable than tirzepatide, whereas patients rated both therapies similar. When asked to choose a preferred long-term therapy assuming equal effectiveness, patients favored tirzepatide (48% vs 21%), while providers preferred CPAP (52% vs 27%). Providers with experience prescribing injectable weight-loss medications were more aligned with patient views. Both groups supported combination therapy, though patients were less enthusiastic than providers (61% vs 86%). Both groups valued a wide range of outcomes for decision making--across symptom, sleep, and cardiometabolic health domains--and emphasized the importance of safety, long-term data, and costs. ConclusionsPatients and providers view CPAP and/or tirzepatide as acceptable options for COBOSA, but preferences diverge. Given equipoise, comparative effectiveness trials are urgently needed to guide individualized treatment strategies. BRIEF SUMMARYO_ST_ABSCurrent Knowledge/Study RationaleC_ST_ABSThe weight-loss medication tirzepatide has recently emerged as a potential treatment option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and comorbid obesity (COBOSA), but little is known about patient and provider attitudes toward this therapy compared with the current first-line treatment of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or what information they need to make informed choices between these options. Study ImpactThis survey demonstrates high levels of acceptability for both tirzepatide and CPAP, supporting clinical equipoise. It also highlights the priorities, concerns, and decision-making factors most relevant to patients and providers, providing a foundation for future comparative trials and implementation efforts that are aligned with stakeholder needs and preferences.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bidirectional relationship between sleep problems and long COVID: a longitudinal analysis of data from the COVIDENCE UK study 90%
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 89%
- Investigating a structured diagnostic approach for chronic breathlessness in primary care: a mixed-methods feasibility cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of OSA Treatment Success on Changes in Hypertension and Obesity: A Retrospective Cohort Study 94%
- Effects of mindfulness meditation and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea with residual excessive sleepiness: A randomized controlled pilot study 92%
- Methodological approach to sleep state misperception in insomnia disorder: comparison between multiple nights of actigraphy recordings and a single night of polysomnography recording 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rethinking Blood Eosinophils for Assessing ICS Response in COPD: A Post-Hoc Analysis from FLAME 87%
- Immediate, remote smoking cessation intervention in participants undergoing a targeted lung health check: QuLIT2 a randomised controlled trial 87%
- Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with specific gut microbiota species and functions in the population-based Swedish CardioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS) 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- A clinical trial to evaluate the dayzz smartphone app on employee sleep, health, and productivity at a large US employer 94%
- Creation of a Shortened Version of the of the Sleep Disorders Questionnaire (SDQ) 90%
- Are adversities and worries during the COVID-19 pandemic related to sleep quality? Longitudinal analyses of 48,000 UK adults 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multidimensional Sleep Profiles via Machine learning and Risk of Dementia and Cardiovascular Disease 89%
- Prospective validation of smartphone-based heart rate and respiratory rate measurement algorithms 87%
- Systematic Review of Large Language Models for Patient Care: Current Applications and Challenges 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.