Acidic transcription factors position the genome at nuclear speckles through transcription dependent and independent mechanisms
Chaturvedi, P.; Ghosh, P.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, H.; Belmont, A. S.
Show abstract
A small fraction of the genome positions reproducibly near nuclear speckles (NS), increasing expression and/or splicing efficiency of NS-associated genes. How specific genomic regions target to NS remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that establishment of genome-wide NS-association occurs independent of active transcription. We show that DNA sequences derived from NS-associated regions integrated as transgenes autonomously target to NS. By systematically dissecting one such genomic locus, the COL1A1-SGCA locus, we identified redundant NS-targeting cis regulatory elements, including a [~]600 bp fragment with 17 binding motifs for 8 transcription factors (TFs). Four NS-targeting TFs within this fragment contain acidic activation domains (AADs) that provide both chromatin-context and transcription-dependent NS-targeting, a property that appears common among several other tested AADs. A subset of acidic activator TFs contain an additional, transcription-independent NS-targeting activity. Our findings establish diverse and partially redundant NS-targeting activities, which may facilitate dynamic gene positioning at NS periphery for context-specific transcriptional responses.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The RING Finger E3 Ligase RNF25 Protects DNA Replication Forks Independently of its Canonical Roles in Ubiquitin Signaling 96%
- CasTuner: a degron and CRISPR/Cas-based toolkit for analog tuning of endogenous gene expression 96%
- A high-content RNAi screen reveals multiple roles for long noncoding RNAs in cell division 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.