Back

Arginine versus Lysine: Molecular Determinants of Cation-π Interactions in Biomolecular Condensates

Armentia, L.; Lopez, X.; De Sancho, D.

2025-10-02 biophysics
10.1101/2025.10.01.679751 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biomolecular condensates formed by intrinsically disordered regions of proteins are primarily stabilised by specific types of amino acids, usually labelled "stickers" for their ability to crosslink distinct polypeptide chains into droplet-spanning networks. Both aromatic and positively charged residues can play this role, but they differ in their interaction types and relative strengths. An outstanding problem is the quantification of these differences, since they determine the fate of multicomponent mixtures. Here we focus on the interactions formed by aromatic residues with the two main positively charged stickers, Arg and Lys, whose experimental behaviour in condensates shows a clear hierarchy: Arg is consistently observed to promote phase separation more effectively than Lys. We use molecular dynamics simulations and alchemical transformations together with quantum chemical calculations to resolve the differences in their cation-{pi} interaction strengths in different media. We find that, unlike the aromatic residues Phe and Tyr, Arg and Lys consistently maintain a hierarchy of interaction strengths across molecular environments, with Arg being favoured over Lys. While cation-{pi} interactions are important, the primary factor underlying this difference is the higher dehydration penalty of Lys. By contrast, the identity of the aromatic partner that forms the strongest interaction with a cation depends on the dielectric environment. These results provide a clear molecular-level explanation for the distinct contributions of interactions between cationic and aromatic residues to condensate stability.

Published in Communications Chemistry (predicted rank #14) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.