Dynamic updating of cognitive maps via traces of experience in the subiculum
Wang, F.; Bicanski, A.
Show abstract
In the classical view of hippocampal function, the subiculum is assigned the role as the output layer. In spatial paradigms, some subiculum neurons manifest as so-called boundary vector cells (BVCs), firing in response to boundaries at specific allocentric directions and distances. More recently it has been shown that some subiculum BVCs can be classified as vector trace cells (VTCs), which exhibit traces of activity after a boundary/object has been removed. Here we propose a model of processing within subiculum that accounts for VTCs, taking into account proximodistal differences in subiculum (pSub vs dSub) and CA1. dSub neurons receive feedforward input, either in the form of perceptual information (from BVCs in pSub) or mnemonic information (from place cells in CA1). Mismatch between these two inputs updates associative memory encoded in the synapses between CA1 and dSub. With a range of learning rates, the model captures the majority of experimental findings, including the distribution of VTCs along the proximodistal axis, the percentage of VTCs across different cue types, and the hours-long persistence of the vector trace. Incorporating experimentally reported effects of inserted objects/rewards on place cells (place field shift), we also explain why VTCs have longer tuning distances after cue removal. This adds predictive character to subiculum traces and suggests the online use of mnemonic content during navigation. Our model suggests that mismatch detection for updating spatial memory content provides a mechanistic explanation for findings in the CA1-subiculum pathway. This work constitutes the first dedicated circuit-level model of computation within the subiculum, consistent with known effects in CA1, and provides a potential framework to extend the canonical model of hippocampal function with a subiculum component.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hippocampal sharp wave-ripples and the associated sequence replay emerge from structured synaptic interactions in a network model of area CA3 98%
- A theory of joint attractor dynamics in the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex accounts for artificial hippocampal remapping and individual grid cell field-to-field variability 97%
- Interacting rhythms enhance sensitivity of target detection in a fronto-parietal computational model of visual attention 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gateway Identity and Spatial Remapping in a Combined Grid and Place Cell Attractor. 98%
- A Model for Navigation in Unknown Environments Based on a Reservoir of Hippocampal Sequences 97%
- Spatial information transfer in hippocampal place cells depends on trial-to-trial variability, symmetry of place-field firing and biophysical heterogeneities 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synaptic weights that correlate with presynaptic selectivity increase decoding performance 96%
- Cortical networks with multiple interneuron types generate oscillatory patterns during predictive coding 96%
- Navigation task and action space drive the emergence of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spontaneous dynamics of hippocampal place fields in a model of combinatorial competition among stable inputs 98%
- Differential excitability of PV and SST neurons results in distinct functional roles in inhibition stabilization of Up-states 96%
- Striatal Gradient in Value-Decay Explains Regional Differences in Dopamine Patterns and Reinforcement Learning Computations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Oscillation-driven memory encoding, maintenance and recall in an entorhinal-hippocampal circuit model 98%
- A Layered Microcircuit Model of Somatosensory Cortex with Three Interneuron Types and Cell-Type-Specific Short-Term Plasticity 95%
- Creative destruction: a basic computational model of cortical layer formation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.