Back

Distinct genomic architectures but the same gene underlie the convergent evolution of a plant supergene

Potente, G.; Yousefi, N.; Choudhury, R. R.; Grob, S.; Gavrilina, I. A.; Keller, B.; Mora-Carrera, E.; Szovenyi, P.; Stubbs, R. L.; Weiss-Schneeweiss, H.; Temsch, E. M.; Schneeweiss, G. M.; Hoffmann, M. H.; Formenti, G.; Mc Cartney, A. M.; Mouton, A.; Leitao, H. G.; Diedericks, G.; Svardal, H.; Diroma, M. A.; Natali, C.; Ciofi, C.; Leveille-Bourret, E.; Conti, E.

2025-10-01 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.10.01.679701 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWEvolution reflects a balance between innovation and constraint, often repurposing existing components in new contexts. Convergent evolution exemplifies this interplay, with similar traits evolving independently in different species, yet the genomic mechanisms enabling such repeatability remain poorly understood. Here, by analyzing ten chromosome-scale genome assemblies, including seven newly generated, we discovered that the S-locus supergene (a cluster of tightly linked genes controlling a floral dimorphism called distyly) arose independently multiple times within the primrose family, Darwins iconic system for studying distyly. In each case, the same gene was independently duplicated and co-opted, yet the resulting genomic architectures differed, ranging from hemizygous (present on one chromosome copy) to heterozygous (on both copies). These diverse architectures shaped supergene evolution differently, with genetic degeneration occurring only in the heterozygous case. By uncovering multiple mechanisms for supergene origins, our work shows how convergent evolution can produce similar phenotypes by reusing the same genetic building blocks while exploring distinct genomic configurations.

Published in Science Advances (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.