Evolutionary divergence in sympatric populations of the fungal pathogen Alternaria alternata across wild tomato hosts
Schmey, T.; Auxier, B.; Krebs, S.; Patneedi, S. K.; Ahmad, F.; Habig, M.; Stam, R.
Show abstract
Alternaria alternata is a globally distributed fungal pathogen with a broad host range, increasingly affecting both tomato crops and wild tomato relatives. The genomic basis of this ecological breadth in A. alternata remains poorly understood. Here we leverage the opportunity of wild pathosystems to study pathogen evolution and diversity beyond agricultural settings. We sampled isolates from wild tomato species across a 2,500 km range in South America, producing highly contiguous genomes, to investigate population structure. Our comparative genomics analyses reveal that A. alternata sensu stricto consists of two divergent clades. Strikingly, this divergence is not linked to host species, geography, or habitat type. Transposable elements contribute to variation within clades but do not explain their separation. Although some signs of recombination are present, reproductive mode appears stable across clades. Notably, global reference isolates cluster with one clade, while the other, more diverse clade is only found in wild populations. We hypothesize that these wild populations may act as reservoirs of evolutionary potential. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions about the population structure of necrotrophic pathogens and raise new questions about how genetic divergence can persist without ecological or geographic isolation. Media summary (lay abstract)The fungus Alternaria alternata is an emerging threat on tomato and potato crops. In a previous study, we found that it also infects wild tomato plants over a large range in Chile and Peru. Here we sequenced and compared full genomes of the fungi. Surprisingly, they formed two distinct groups that do not reflect different host plant species, geographical locations, or environments. One of those groups is related more closely to global reference samples, while the other group is more diverse. This suggests wild plants may quietly harbour forms of the fungus that could affect crops in the future.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-scale transcriptomics to dissect two years of the life of a fungal phytopathogen interacting with its host plant 96%
- Uncovering the history of recombination and population structure in western Canadian stripe rust populations through mating-type alleles 96%
- Genome-wide expression QTL mapping reveals the highly dynamic regulatory landscape of a major wheat pathogen 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Complete genome of the Medicago anthracnose fungus, Colletotrichum destructivum, reveals a mini-chromosome-like region within a core chromosome. 96%
- Adaptative and ancient co-evolution of integrons with Xanthomonas genomes 94%
- Symbiosis genes show a unique pattern of introgression and selection within a Rhizobium leguminosarum species complex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid sequence evolution driven by transposable elements at a virulence locus in a fungal wheat pathogen 96%
- Evolutionary genomics reveals variation in structure and genetic content implicated in virulence and lifestyle in the genus Gaeumannomyces 95%
- Comparative genomics of Alternaria species provides insights into the pathogenic lifestyle of Alternaria brassicae - a pathogen of the Brassicaceae family 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recurrent loss of abaA, a master regulator of asexual development in filamentous fungi, correlates with changes in genomic and morphological traits 94%
- A New Case Of Diploidy Within A Haploid Genus Of Entomopathogenic Fungi 94%
- Whole genome comparisons of ergot fungi reveals the divergence and evolution of species within the genus Claviceps are the result of varying mechanisms driving genome evolution and host range expansion 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.