Back

Determination of Drug Sensitivity in Patient Derived Models of Breast Cancer by Multiparametric QPI

Polanco, E. R.; Moustafa, T. E.; Balcioglu, O.; Scherer, S. D.; Cortes-Sanchez, E.; Remick, S.; Spike, B. T.; Welm, A. L.; Welm, B. E.; Bernard, P. S.; Zangle, T. A.

2025-10-01 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.10.01.674349 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional precision oncology seeks to match patients with effective therapies by empirically testing patient-derived samples for drug sensitivity in the laboratory. However, existing approaches require significant sample expansion time and expense prior to analysis, rendering them impractical for routine clinical testing. Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) provides a potential path forward by directly measuring responses at single cell resolution without the need for extensive sample expansion. In previous work, we demonstrated that multiple, independent parameters of cellular response to therapeutic agents can be derived from QPI data, an approach we call multiparametric QPI (mQPI). Here, we demonstrate application of mQPI using cells from patient derived xenograft organoid (PDxO) models, as well as cells viably frozen direct from patients. Using mQPI with breast cancer PDxO models, we uncover distinct drug responses for cells originating from different anatomic sites in the same patient and resolve cellular heterogeneity of response in a model of acquired therapeutic resistance. We also show that mQPI can detect drug responses in viably frozen primary patient samples, either direct from thaw or after a short term expansion of only 2 weeks. Overall, these data provide proof-of-principle for application of mQPI to a range of sample types, including cryopreserved material direct from patients. This underscores the clinical potential of mQPI as a time- and materials-efficient alternative to current methods in functional precision oncology.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
21.8%
2
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.9%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
6.2%
4
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
5
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.5%
7
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
9
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.0%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.8%
12
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
14
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
17
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
21
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
26
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%