Back

Restorative Justice Approaches to Conflict Management in Healthcare Workplaces: A Systematic Review Protocol

Shankar, R.; Devi, F.; Xu, Q.

2025-10-03 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2025.10.01.25337131
Show abstract

BackgroundHealthcare workplaces experience significant interpersonal conflicts affecting staff wellbeing, patient safety, and organizational performance. Traditional punitive approaches to conflict management often fail to address underlying issues, potentially perpetuating cycles of dysfunction. Restorative justice, emphasizing healing, accountability, and relationship repair over punishment, offers promising alternatives for healthcare conflict resolution. Despite growing implementation, systematic evidence synthesis regarding effectiveness, implementation factors, and outcomes remains absent. ObjectivesThis systematic review protocol aims to synthesize evidence on restorative justice approaches for managing workplace conflicts in healthcare settings, examining implementation processes, effectiveness, barriers, facilitators, and impacts on staff wellbeing, patient care, and organizational culture. MethodsFollowing PRISMA-P guidelines, we will search ten databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Business Source Premier, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest) from inception to December 2025. The SPIDER framework guides eligibility criteria focusing on healthcare workers involved in restorative justice interventions, their experiences and outcomes across diverse healthcare contexts. Covidence will facilitate study screening and selection. Quality assessment will employ the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), with risk of bias evaluated using appropriate domain-specific tools. Narrative synthesis and thematic analysis will integrate quantitative and qualitative findings. GRADE-CERQual will assess confidence in qualitative evidence synthesis. DiscussionThis protocol anticipates generating comprehensive evidence regarding restorative justice implementation models, effectiveness indicators, contextual factors influencing success, stakeholder experiences, and comparative advantages over traditional approaches. Evidence generated will inform policy development, implementation guidelines, and training programs for healthcare organizations seeking transformative conflict resolution approaches that prioritize healing, learning, and relationship restoration over punitive measures.

Matching journals

1
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 3%
5.6× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 26%
16.6%
3
Systematic Reviews
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
146× avg
4
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.1%
144× avg
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 3%
6.9× avg
6
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.3%
85× avg
7
Journal of Occupational Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
71× avg
8
Archives of Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.1%
38× avg
9
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
BMJ · based on 32 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
10
JAMA Network Open
American Medical Association (AMA) · based on 125 published papers
Top 6%
3.6× avg
11
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 12%
2.5× avg
12
Journal of Hospital Infection
Elsevier BV · based on 21 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
13
BMC Health Services Research
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 43 published papers
Top 3%
7.1× avg
14
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.7%
21× avg
15
SSM - Population Health
Elsevier BV · based on 17 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
16
Psychiatry Research
Elsevier BV · based on 33 published papers
Top 4%
4.5× avg
17
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 86%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers Media SA · based on 56 published papers
Top 8%
2.2× avg