Restorative Justice Approaches to Conflict Management in Healthcare Workplaces: A Systematic Review Protocol
Shankar, R.; Devi, F.; Xu, Q.
Show abstract
BackgroundHealthcare workplaces experience significant interpersonal conflicts affecting staff wellbeing, patient safety, and organizational performance. Traditional punitive approaches to conflict management often fail to address underlying issues, potentially perpetuating cycles of dysfunction. Restorative justice, emphasizing healing, accountability, and relationship repair over punishment, offers promising alternatives for healthcare conflict resolution. Despite growing implementation, systematic evidence synthesis regarding effectiveness, implementation factors, and outcomes remains absent. ObjectivesThis systematic review protocol aims to synthesize evidence on restorative justice approaches for managing workplace conflicts in healthcare settings, examining implementation processes, effectiveness, barriers, facilitators, and impacts on staff wellbeing, patient care, and organizational culture. MethodsFollowing PRISMA-P guidelines, we will search ten databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Business Source Premier, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest) from inception to December 2025. The SPIDER framework guides eligibility criteria focusing on healthcare workers involved in restorative justice interventions, their experiences and outcomes across diverse healthcare contexts. Covidence will facilitate study screening and selection. Quality assessment will employ the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), with risk of bias evaluated using appropriate domain-specific tools. Narrative synthesis and thematic analysis will integrate quantitative and qualitative findings. GRADE-CERQual will assess confidence in qualitative evidence synthesis. DiscussionThis protocol anticipates generating comprehensive evidence regarding restorative justice implementation models, effectiveness indicators, contextual factors influencing success, stakeholder experiences, and comparative advantages over traditional approaches. Evidence generated will inform policy development, implementation guidelines, and training programs for healthcare organizations seeking transformative conflict resolution approaches that prioritize healing, learning, and relationship restoration over punitive measures.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 97%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 96%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interventions for burnout and well-being in homelessness staff: a systematic scoping review 96%
- Suicide prevention curriculum development for health and social care students: Protocol for a scoping review 95%
- Hospital at home: a systematic review of how medication management is conceptualised, described and implemented in practice – a study protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 93%
- The Impact of Income Support Systems on Healthcare Quality and Functional Capacity in Workers with Low Back Pain: A Realist Review 92%
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of an internet-based stress management program in micro- and small-sized enterprises: A study protocol for a pre-post feasibility study of the effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial 94%
- A Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of caregivers of hospitalised children in South Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study 93%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Leading from the front’ implementation strategies increase the success of influenza vaccination drives among healthcare workers: A reanalysis of Systematic Review evidence using Intervention Component Analysis (ICA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) 95%
- Healthcare workers experiences of working on the frontline and views about support during COVID-19 and comparable pandemics: A rapid review and meta-synthesis 94%
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.