Back

Restorative Justice Approaches to Conflict Management in Healthcare Workplaces: A Systematic Review Protocol

Shankar, R.; Devi, F.; Xu, Q.

2025-10-03 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2025.10.01.25337131 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHealthcare workplaces experience significant interpersonal conflicts affecting staff wellbeing, patient safety, and organizational performance. Traditional punitive approaches to conflict management often fail to address underlying issues, potentially perpetuating cycles of dysfunction. Restorative justice, emphasizing healing, accountability, and relationship repair over punishment, offers promising alternatives for healthcare conflict resolution. Despite growing implementation, systematic evidence synthesis regarding effectiveness, implementation factors, and outcomes remains absent. ObjectivesThis systematic review protocol aims to synthesize evidence on restorative justice approaches for managing workplace conflicts in healthcare settings, examining implementation processes, effectiveness, barriers, facilitators, and impacts on staff wellbeing, patient care, and organizational culture. MethodsFollowing PRISMA-P guidelines, we will search ten databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Business Source Premier, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest) from inception to December 2025. The SPIDER framework guides eligibility criteria focusing on healthcare workers involved in restorative justice interventions, their experiences and outcomes across diverse healthcare contexts. Covidence will facilitate study screening and selection. Quality assessment will employ the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), with risk of bias evaluated using appropriate domain-specific tools. Narrative synthesis and thematic analysis will integrate quantitative and qualitative findings. GRADE-CERQual will assess confidence in qualitative evidence synthesis. DiscussionThis protocol anticipates generating comprehensive evidence regarding restorative justice implementation models, effectiveness indicators, contextual factors influencing success, stakeholder experiences, and comparative advantages over traditional approaches. Evidence generated will inform policy development, implementation guidelines, and training programs for healthcare organizations seeking transformative conflict resolution approaches that prioritize healing, learning, and relationship restoration over punitive measures.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
19.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
3
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
8
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
17
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
21
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%