Back

eREACH: A randomized trial of digital alternatives to genetic counseling for metastatic cancer

Lee, K. T.; Egleston, B.; McLeod, B.; Brown, S.; Howe, S.; Fetzer, D.; Domchek, S. M.; Gutstein, L.; Cacioppo, C.; Clark, D.; Christiansen, J.; Ebrahimzadeh, J.; Ofidis, D.; Griffin, H.; Mim, R.; Hernandez, S.; Fleisher, L.; Karpink, K.; Selmani, E.; Tahsin, A.; Mataglio, E.; Wagner, L.; Weinberg, M.; Yi-Wen, K.; Wood, E.; Bradbury, A. R.

2025-10-03 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.10.01.25337108 medRxiv
Show abstract

With FDA approval of targeted therapies in patients with germline BRCA1/2-related advanced cancers there is a need to evaluate efficient and effective delivery models for germline cancer genetic testing. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of replacing traditional pretest and posttest counseling with a genetic counselor (GC) with a digital intervention in patients with metastatic cancers. eREACH is a 4-arm randomized non-inferiority trial with a 2x2 design conducted from 2020-2024 and participants were followed for 6 months. Participants were recruited from the community and academic and community medical sites across the United States. A referred sample of adults with advanced or metastatic breast, prostate, ovarian or pancreatic cancer. The digital pretest intervention consists of 8 modules including purpose of genetic testing and implications of results. The digital post-test intervention consists of 4 modules including test results and explanation of results. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority in change in knowledge and anxiety from baseline to post-disclosure. Secondary analyses evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as depression and distress, and moderators of PROs such as socioeconomic status. 229 participants were recruited from 14 states and 37% were male, 17% were non-white, 43% had less than a college education and 21% were from community sites or national recruitment. We met non-inferiority for all short-term PROs for both one visit arms (GC/Digital, Digital/GC). We met non-inferiority for all short-term PROs in the fully digital arm except knowledge which was inconclusive, although differences were small. Uptake of visit 1 was lower in the digital arms, although uptake of testing after visit 1 did not differ between arms. Patients living in poorer areas had greater reductions in anxiety in the visit 1 GC arms and rural patients had greater increase in knowledge in digital arms. Men had greater decreases in anxiety with digital disclosure, while women had greater reductions with GC disclosure. The eREACH patient-centered digital delivery intervention with one GC visit is an evidence-based alternative to two visits with a GC for patients with metastatic cancer. The fully digital model may be acceptable for some patients.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.7%
2
Genetics in Medicine Open
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.6%
4
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
6
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
7
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
8
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
10
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
Value in Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Journal of Medical Genetics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
16
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
JAMA
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%