Barriers and Facilitators to Integrating Traditional Chinese Medicine into Primary Healthcare in Singapore: A Systematic Review Protocol
Shankar, R.; Devi, F.; Xu, Q.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) into primary healthcare systems represents a significant opportunity to enhance healthcare delivery in multicultural societies. Singapores unique position as a modern healthcare hub with deep cultural roots in traditional medicine provides an important context for examining this integration process. ObjectiveTo systematically identify, evaluate, and synthesize evidence regarding barriers and facilitators affecting TCM integration into Singapores primary healthcare system through a comprehensive mixed-methods systematic review. MethodsThis systematic review protocol follows PRISMA-P guidelines and employs a mixed-methods approach. Database searches will include PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, AMED, Singapore Medical Journal archives, and Chinese medicine databases (CNKI, Wanfang Data) from inception to December 2025. No language restrictions will be applied. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers using Covidence systematic review software. Quality assessment will utilize the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for diverse study designs, with additional tools (CASP checklists, GRADE-CERQual) applied as appropriate. Data SynthesisA convergent integrated approach will combine narrative synthesis with framework analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will guide the organization and interpretation of barriers and facilitators across five domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and process. Quantitative findings will be synthesized narratively, while qualitative data will undergo thematic synthesis. Integration will occur through triangulation protocols and matrix mapping. Expected OutcomesComprehensive mapping of multi-level barriers and facilitators, identification of evidence gaps, development of a conceptual framework for TCM integration, and evidence-based recommendations for policy and practice in Singapores healthcare system.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hospital at home: a systematic review of how medication management is conceptualised, described and implemented in practice – a study protocol 95%
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 94%
- Investigating the Nature of Open Science Practices Across Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An Audit 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 96%
- International Prevalence Of Consultation With A Naturopathic Practitioner: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis 95%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 95%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- ‘Leading from the front’ implementation strategies increase the success of influenza vaccination drives among healthcare workers: A reanalysis of Systematic Review evidence using Intervention Component Analysis (ICA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare Consumers’ Perceptions of Incentive-Linked Prescribing: A Scoping Review of Research 94%
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 93%
- Access to essential medicines for noncommunicable diseases during conflicts: the case cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and epilepsy in Northern Syria 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 92%
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 91%
- Understanding the Challenges of Medicine Optimisation Among Older People From Ethnic Minority Communities (Aged 60 Years and Above) With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Realist Review Protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.