Back

CXCR1 and CXCR2 display receptor bias for shared chemokine agonists

Jassal, C.; Strawn, J.; Rajarathnam, K.; Rajagopal, S.

2025-10-02 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.09.30.679682 bioRxiv
Show abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate diverse signaling outputs through their proximal transducers: G proteins, GRKs, and {beta}-arrestins. Although ligand bias at chemokine receptors (CKRs), where ligands for the same receptor display distinct signaling patterns, is well recognized, receptor bias, where the same agonist at different receptors yields distinct transducer engagement, remains poorly understood. We compared endogenous chemokine ligands (CXCL1, CXCL5, CXCL7, CXCL8) at the highly homologous CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors using biosensor assays to measure Gi activation, {beta}-arrestin1/2 recruitment, GRK2/3/5/6 translocation, and receptor internalization. Our data reveal qualitatively different signaling patterns, most notably where CXCL1 acts as a G protein-biased partial agonist at CXCR1 but as a balanced full agonist at CXCR2. These signaling differences correlate with receptor internalization but not subcellular ERK activation patterns measured using compartment-specific biosensors. Collectively, our findings demonstrate receptor bias in CKR signaling, transducer activation, and compartmentalized kinase activation in translating chemokine identity into discrete functional outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTChemokine ligand bias, where different ligands for the same receptor display different signaling patterns, is now well appreciated. However, there are only few examples of receptor bias, where the same agonist generates distinct signaling profiles at different receptors. Here we used biosensors and compartmental ERK biosensors, to show that CXCL1, CXCL5, CXCL7, and CXCL8 differentially engage G proteins, {beta}-arrestins, and GRKs, at CXCR1 and CXCR2. This work provides mechanistic insight into CXCR1/CXCR2 signaling diversity.

Published in Molecular Pharmacology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

Molecular Pharmacology · published here
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.9%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 2%
19.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
4
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
5
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
8
Science Signaling
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
9
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 17%
2.0%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.0%
11
Cellular Signalling
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Biochemical Journal
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
14
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
17
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
96 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Journal of Neurochemistry
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%