Back

Tree microbiomes and methane emissions in upland forests

Gewirtzman, J.; Arnold, W.; Taylor, M.; Burrows, H.; Merenstein, C.; Woodbury, D.; Whitlock, N.; Kraut, K.; Gonzalez, L.; Brodersen, C. R.; Duguid, M.; Raymond, P. A.; Peccia, J.; Bradford, M. A.

2025-09-30 ecology
10.1101/2025.09.30.679632 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RationaleUpland forest trees emit CH , but whether emissions derive from internal microbial production or soil-derived transport remains debated. Methanogens have been detected in heartwood of several species, yet the prevalence of wood-associated methanogenesis, its metabolic basis, and its relationship to co-occurring methanotrophy are poorly understood. MethodsWe measured 1,148 stem fluxes and 276 soil fluxes, sampled internal stem gases including {delta}{superscript 1}3CH , quantified methanogens and methanotrophs via ddPCR in 564 samples, characterized communities via 16S rRNA sequencing, and upscaled fluxes. Key resultsMethanogens were detected in 97% of heartwood samples (up to 10 copies g {superscript 1}) at concentrations exceeding soil by [~]2 orders of magnitude; methane consumers were likewise near-ubiquitous across forest compartments. Wood harbored distinct microbial communities dominated by hydrogenotrophic Methanobacteriaceae, corroborated by depleted {delta}{superscript 1}3CH . Vertical flux profiles indicated soil transport only in wet microsites, with uniform emissions across height consistent with internal production across most upland species. Species-level methanogen:methanotroph ratios predicted emissions (R{superscript 2} = 0.51), indicating net flux reflects the balance between production and oxidation. Main conclusionMethane-cycling microbes are widespread in upland trees, and net methane flux reflects the species-level balance between production and consumption. Internal methanogenesis contributes widely to upland tree emissions; resolving ecosystem-scale magnitude requires improved quantification of woody surface area and vertical flux variability.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.