Back

Evolutionarily Conserved and Divergent Mechanisms of Dual Ca2+ Sensors in Synaptic Vesicle Exocytosis

Li, L.; Xia, J.; Wang, J.; Yu, X.; Hu, J.; Richmond, J.; Liu, H.; Hu, Z.

2025-10-01 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.09.30.679486 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neurotransmitter release at the C. elegans neuromuscular junction is governed by a dual Ca{superscript 2} sensor system composed of SNT-1 and SNT-3, which are functional analogs of synaptotagmin-1 and -7 (Syt1/Syt7) in mammalian central synapses. In this study, we investigated how SNT-1 and SNT-3 mediate fast and slow neurotransmitter release through their potential interactions with the SNARE complex and their polybasic motifs. AlphaFold 3 models of SNT-1-SNARE and SNT-3-SNARE complexes accurately recapitulated the canonical Syt1 C2B-SNARE primary interface (Zhou et al., 2015, Nature) and precisely identified conserved binding residues within the C2B domains, as well as in SNAP-25 and Syntaxin, highlighting the evolutionary conservation of this interaction. Electrophysiological analyses using targeted mutagenesis demonstrated that both SNT-1 and SNT-3 require C2B-SNARE interactions and polybasic motifs within their C2 domains to drive evoked fast and slow neurotransmitter release. Notably, SNT-1 and SNT-3 exhibited differential dependence on distinct regions of the C2B-SNARE interface and their respective polybasic motifs, suggesting that Ca{superscript 2}-triggered fast and slow release operate via distinct mechanistic strategies. Furthermore, we found that SNT-1 mediates spontaneous neurotransmitter release through multiple pathways, involving not only the primary C2B-SNARE interface but also additional putative SNARE-binding interactions. Together, our findings uncover both conserved and divergent mechanisms for synaptic exocytosis regulated by the dual Ca2+ sensors in C. elegans.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.