Back

Individual differences in the pharmacokinetic profiling of {triangleup}9-THC may be associated with differential motivational effects of {triangleup}9-THC on cognitive performance.

Myers, T. M.; Neverette, N. C.; Devanathan, A. S.; Torregrossa, M. M.

2025-10-02 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.09.30.679373 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RationaleCannabis is the most widely used illicit substance in the United States, and its use is increasing with the recent push for legalization and decriminalization, as well as the growing use for medicinal purposes. While cannabis can have positive effects in some individuals, there are potential negative consequences including dependence, psychosis, and cognitive impairments. The top reported reasoning for using cannabis is to alleviate stress, however, whether cannabis differentially induces positive or negative effects under stress has not been studied. ObjectivesThe current study investigates whether stress affects working memory, and if THC can exacerbate or ameliorate its effect. An additional aim is to determine if plasma THC concentrations are associated with cognitive performance MethodsAdult male and female Sprague Dawley rats performed a delay-match-to-sample working memory task. Rats assigned to the stress group were exposed to acute restraint stress prior to administration of either vehicle, 0.5,1, or 3 mg/kg THC. Blood samples were collected 5, 25, 60, and 120 minutes after administration. ResultsAcute restraint stress and THC did not impact working memory. However, acute administration of 3mg/kg THC disrupted motivation-related engagement in the task in a subset of rats. These non-responders exhibited greater plasma THC and metabolite concentrations compared to rats who maintained baseline response rates after 3mg/kg THC administration. ConclusionsIndividual differences in the pharmacokinetic/metabolic profile of THC may be associated with differential sensitivity to cognitive/motivational effects of THC and highlight one potential mechanism for the diversity of reported adverse versus positive outcomes after THC exposure.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.