Back

The changing status of imperiled species in British Columbia over the last 15 years in the absence of a dedicated species at risk law

Thompson, P.; Bjordal, M.; Piczak, M.; Otto, S.

2025-10-01 ecology
10.1101/2025.09.30.679339 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gaps in biodiversity protection occur in Canada due to limited jurisdiction of federal species-at-risk laws and the absence of dedicated legislation in many provinces, including British Columbia (B.C.). While lacking legal protection, B.C. maintains Red, Blue, and Yellow Lists of threatened, special-concern, and secure species, respectively, using a NatureServe ranking system. We compiled historical data on species status in B.C. between 2008 and 2024 from the B.C. Conservation Data Centre. B.C. is home to 5,485 Yellow, 1,116 Blue, 491 Red-listed species. Changes in status over this time period were reported for 967 animal species, with an even split in uplistings (more imperiled) and downlistings (less imperiled). More status changes were reported for plants (2,902), mainly due to updated methodology leading to a lower risk status. Analysing the accompanying explanation for each status change revealed that most changes were non-genuine (e.g., new information, taxonomy, or methodology) rather than genuine (e.g., true changes in population size, range, or threats). Genuine improvements in the status of species in B.C. have been exceedingly rare. This analysis indicates that current laws and regulations have been insufficient to recover species at risk within B.C. Plain-language summaryBritish Columbia is the most biodiverse province in Canada, yet 1,607 species are imperiled in the province. We analysed trends, finding a 16% rise in the number of species at risk since 2008. By analysing the provided explanations, we found that status improvements were mostly "non-genuine", caused by changing methodology and/or new data. Strengthening legal protections is essential to prevent biodiversity loss in the province.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.9%
2
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.1%
5
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
8
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
11
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
14
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
16
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
25
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%