Back

AlveolEye: Rapid and precise lung morphometry guided by computer vision

Hirsh, J.; Hirsh, S.; Shirazi, S. P.; Hirsh, J.; Douglas, I.; Garg, S.; Son, Y.; Pierre-Louis, A.; Bunn, C.; Jetter, C. S.; James, T. J.; Sharkey, A. L.; Benjamin, J. T.; Kropski, J. A.; Sucre, J. M. S.; Negretti, N. M.

2025-10-02 developmental biology
10.1101/2025.09.30.679300 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rigorous and reproducible evaluation of lung tissue under different conditions is necessary to interpret development, injury, and pharmacologic interventions. Common histological measurements in the distal lung include mean linear intercept (MLI) as a metric of alveolarization and airspace volume density (ASVD) as a metric of airspaces relative to tissue. Historically, these have been performed manually in a time-intensive process, with reproducible trends, but a high degree of variability between individuals. To improve the reproducibility and throughput of lung morphometry, we developed AlveolEye, an open source, semi-automated, computer vision-assisted tool that rapidly and reproducibly calculates MLI and ASVD from images of standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue sections. AlveolEye-assisted MLI calculation closely aligns with manually-derived measurements for corresponding images, with preservation of trends in measurements between non-injured controls and neonatal mice subjected to two different injury models. Analyzing human tissue of varying ages suggests that the approach developed in AlveolEye is generalizable across species. Notably, AlveolEye markedly reduced the average variation across individual analyzers, with the greatest improvement in precision among individuals with the least experience in performing lung morphometry. The design of AlveolEye is intentionally semi-automated, preserving the investigators ability to assess and adjust parameters based on sample characteristics. AlveolEye facilitates efficient lung morphological measurements on larger sample sizes, allowing for greater statistical power for preclinical studies, and improves precision across individual observers, allowing for improved rigor in experimental design and execution.

Published in American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.