Back

iNaturalist mammal observations classified by evidence type

Alyetama, M.; Jensen, A. J.; Jackson, Y.; Widness, J.; Kays, R.; Goldstein, B. R.

2025-10-01 ecology
10.1101/2025.09.30.678090 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ecologists show growing interest in observational data generated by participatory scientists. For mammals, the largest participatory science platform is iNaturalist, which has more than 2.8 million observations from North American represented through images of living animals, dead animals, tracks, and scat. These different types of evidence could give insight into the underlying sampling paradigm for an observation (e.g. dead animals might be more likely to be reported near roads) and thus may be useful for scientific applications of these data. However, while iNaturalist allows users to annotate observations by evidence type, many observations are not annotated. We use machine learning (ML) to classify the evidence types associated with observations of North American mammals in iNaturalist, adding metadata that can be used to subset data or to model multiple observation processes. Here, we present a dataset containing metadata augmenting 1.33 million North American mammal iNaturalist observations with evidence type. Each observation is categorized as either live animal, dead animal, tracks, scat, or other sign, and an associated confidence score is provided.

Published in PLOS One · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.