Back

Effects of statin treatment on primary and hospital care use: a microsimulation model

Zhou, J.; Wu, R.; Williams, C.; Carvalho, C.; Robson, J.; Mihaylova, B.

2025-10-02 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.09.30.25337016 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundStatin treatments efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness are well accepted, but the long-term impact on healthcare use is not fully understood. We assessed statin treatment effects on primary and hospital care use over time. MethodsThe UK Biobank population cohort with linked hospital admissions (N=501,807) and primary healthcare data (N=192,983) informed models of hospital admissions, hospital inpatient days, primary care services (consultations, diagnostic and monitoring tests, and medication prescription items) associated with individual characteristics and occurrences of myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization and vascular death. These models were integrated into a validated cardiovascular disease (CVD) microsimulation policy model to assess statin treatment effects on healthcare use in population categories by age (40-60 years and 60-70 years) and prior CVD history. ResultsStatin treatment was associated with improved survival and lower rates of hospital admissions, hospital inpatient days and prescription items per person-year over lifetime. Compared to no treatment, healthcare use with statin treatment was lower in earlier years after initiation, these reductions diminished over time and transitioned into higher healthcare use. The number of years to net neutral effect (95%CI) ranged from 9 (7-12) to 17 (9-25) for consultations/tests, from 22 (17-28) to 38 (28-48) for prescription items/hospital admissions, and from 40 (30-47) to 51 (43-62) for hospital inpatient days. Earlier transitions were observed in older people and people with prior CVD history. ConclusionsStatin treatment reduces individual rates of hospital inpatient services and medication prescriptions but increases overall healthcare use driven by increased longevity and ageing. FundingNIHR-HTA, NIHR-Barts-BRC.

Published in Value in Health · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.