Effects of statin treatment on primary and hospital care use: a microsimulation model
Zhou, J.; Wu, R.; Williams, C.; Carvalho, C.; Robson, J.; Mihaylova, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundStatin treatments efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness are well accepted, but the long-term impact on healthcare use is not fully understood. We assessed statin treatment effects on primary and hospital care use over time. MethodsThe UK Biobank population cohort with linked hospital admissions (N=501,807) and primary healthcare data (N=192,983) informed models of hospital admissions, hospital inpatient days, primary care services (consultations, diagnostic and monitoring tests, and medication prescription items) associated with individual characteristics and occurrences of myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization and vascular death. These models were integrated into a validated cardiovascular disease (CVD) microsimulation policy model to assess statin treatment effects on healthcare use in population categories by age (40-60 years and 60-70 years) and prior CVD history. ResultsStatin treatment was associated with improved survival and lower rates of hospital admissions, hospital inpatient days and prescription items per person-year over lifetime. Compared to no treatment, healthcare use with statin treatment was lower in earlier years after initiation, these reductions diminished over time and transitioned into higher healthcare use. The number of years to net neutral effect (95%CI) ranged from 9 (7-12) to 17 (9-25) for consultations/tests, from 22 (17-28) to 38 (28-48) for prescription items/hospital admissions, and from 40 (30-47) to 51 (43-62) for hospital inpatient days. Earlier transitions were observed in older people and people with prior CVD history. ConclusionsStatin treatment reduces individual rates of hospital inpatient services and medication prescriptions but increases overall healthcare use driven by increased longevity and ageing. FundingNIHR-HTA, NIHR-Barts-BRC.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Causes of death in people with cardiovascular disease: a prospective UK Biobank cohort study 94%
- Estimating the Population Benefits of Blood Pressure Lowering: A Wide-Angled Mendelian Randomization Study in UK Biobank 94%
- Age at menopause and the risk of stroke: Observational and Mendelian Randomization analysis in 204,244 postmenopausal women 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of polygenic risk score-stratified screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm 93%
- Transferability of genetic loci and polygenic scores for cardiometabolic traits in British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis 92%
- A unified framework for estimating country-specific cumulative incidence for 18 diseases stratified by polygenic risk 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of antithrombotic use and COVID-19 outcomes in a nationwide atrial fibrillation cohort 92%
- Place and causes of acute cardiovascular mortality during the COVID19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study of 580,972 deaths in England and Wales, 2014 to 2020 91%
- Predicting the risk of motor vehicle crash in the first year after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic Importance of Genomic and Clinical Risk for Coronary Artery Disease Over the Life Course 95%
- A polygenic risk score for coronary heart disease performs well in individuals aged 70 years and older 94%
- A Polygenic Risk Score for Coronary Artery Disease Improves the Prediction of Early-Onset Myocardial Infarction and Mortality in Men 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 91%
- Natural Language Processing to Identify Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Aortic Stenosis 91%
- Clinical and genetic associations of asymmetric apical and septal left ventricular hypertrophy 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.