Back

Shear-Wave Anisotropy of the Vastus Lateralis During Low-Level Isometric Contraction Measured with Ultrasound Time-Harmonic Elastography

Meyer, T.; Klemmer chandia, S.; Engl, P.; Valli, G.; Wu, Y.; Jenderka, K.; Bartels, T.; Schwesig, R.; Guo, J.; Kurz, E.; Sack, I.; Aghamiry, H. S.

2025-10-01 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.09.30.25336813 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeSkeletal muscle is commonly modeled as a transverse isotropic medium, however, the behavior of its anisotropy under active loading remains insufficiently characterized. In this study we used ultrasound time-harmonic elastography (THE) to quantify direction-dependent shear-wave speed (SWS) in the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle at rest and during low isometric contraction intensities. MethodsTwenty-six healthy adults (15 men, 11 women; 25.0 {+/-} 4.1 y) under-went multi-frequency THE (60-80 Hz). The transducer was aligned parallel (longitudinal) and perpendicular (transverse) to VL fascicles, and measurements were acquired at rest and at 15% and 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). The anisotropy index (AI) was defined as AI = SW S||/SW S{perp}. Orientation and contraction effects were tested with repeated-measures analyses. ResultsAt rest, longitudinal SWS exceeded transverse SWS (2.5 {+/-} 0.2 vs. 1.4 {+/-} 0.1 m/s; paired t-test p < 0.01). With contraction, SWS increased to 3.2 {+/-} 0.2 and 3.8 {+/-} 0.3 m/s (15%, 30% MVC) along fibers, and to 1.6 {+/-} 0.1 and 1.8 {+/-} 0.1 m/s across fibers (all p < 0.01). A two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA on SWS showed main effects of orientation and contraction and a significant interaction (all p < 0.01). AI increased from 1.7 {+/-} 0.1 at rest to 2.0 {+/-} 0.1 at 15% and 2.1 {+/-} 0.1 at 30% MVC (p < 0.01). No sex- or BMI-related effects were detected. ConclusionVL exhibited marked shear-wave anisotropy at rest that increased with low-level contraction intensities, indicating disproportionate stiffening along the fiber direction. THE provides a rapid, cost-effective, orientation-sensitive readout of muscle mechanics that may support studies of neuromuscular function and pathology.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.4%
3
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
7
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
8
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
10
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
28
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%