Reply to: The chemotherapeutic drug CX-5461 is a potent mutagen in cultured human cells
Kanwal, S.; Brajanovski, N.; Zhan, J.; Chan, J.; Rebello, R.; Hofmann, O.; Grimmond, S.; Furic, L.; Hannan, R.; McArthur, G.; Poortinga, G.; Harrison, S.; Sanij, E.; Khot, A.; Sandhu, S.
Show abstract
Replying to GCC Koh et al., Nature Genetics (www.nature.com/articles/s41588-023-01602-9) and the comments by Simon Boulton in Nature Genetics (www.nature.com/articles/s41588-023-01611-8). The drug CX-5461 [Pidnarulex] is an inhibitor of RNA polymerase I and topoisomerase II and a DNA G-quadruplex stabilizer. Koh et al. recently reported that CX-5461 induces extensive, non-selective collateral mutagenesis in vitro at magnitudes surpassing known environmental carcinogens, raising concerns about its potential to promote secondary cancers. Mindful that the report of Koh et al. was exclusively an in vitro study, we applied the same ultra-sensitive, error-corrected TwinStrand Duplex Sequencing approach and analyses (methods) to a longitudinal series of clinical specimens from four patients who participated in the Phase I dose-escalation trial of CX-5461 in advanced haematologic malignancies [ACTRN12613001061729]. In contrast to the findings of Koh et al. we found no evidence that clinical administration of CX-5461 significantly increased mutational burden in patient samples, nor did we observe the reported mutational signature. These results suggest that the mutagenic effects described in vitro do not translate to the clinical setting. This is particularly important given that several clinical trials, including a Phase Ib study of CX-5461 in patients with solid tumours [NCT04890613] and a National Cancer Institute sponsored Phase I trial [NCT06606990] are currently enrolling patients. These ongoing and planned clinical efforts highlight both the therapeutic promise of CX-5461 and the importance of evaluating this agent within rigorous and clinically relevant frameworks.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase 1b dose expansion and translational analyses of olaparib in combination with the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib in recurrent endometrial, triple negative breast, and ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer 93%
- A phase I clinical trial of intrahepatic artery delivery of TG6002 in combination with oral 5-fluorocytosine in patients with liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer 92%
- Elucidating the heterogeneity of immunotherapy response and immune-related toxicities by longitudinal ctDNA and immune cell compartment tracking in lung cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A three gene signature predicts response to selinexor in multiple myeloma 92%
- Using a recently approved tumor mutational burden biomarker to stratify patients for immunotherapy may introduce a sex bias 90%
- Clinical Opportunities For Germline Pharmacogenetics And Management Of Drug-Drug Interactions In Patients With Advanced Solid Cancers 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of regulators of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor response through complementary CRISPR knockout and activation screens 92%
- Priming versus propagating: distinct immune effects of an alpha- versus beta-particle emitting radiopharmaceutical when combined with immune checkpoint inhibition 92%
- Adjuvant nivolumab, capecitabine or the combination in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer: the OXEL randomized phase II study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (Atm) disruption sensitizes spatially-directed H3.3K27M/TP53 diffuse midline gliomas to radiation therapy 91%
- PI3K/mTOR is a therapeutically targetable genetic dependency in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma 91%
- Antibody-drug conjugates targeting CD45 plus Janus kinase inhibitors effectively condition for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.