Data-driven burst shape analysis for functional phenotyping of neuronal cultures
Schaefer, T. J.; Giannakakis, E.; Schmidt-Barbo, P.; Levina, A.; Vinogradov, O.
Show abstract
Cultures of neurons in vitro are instrumental for studying network dynamics in normal and pathological conditions. Mature networks typically exhibit network bursting activity, which has traditionally been quantified by simplified features such as inter-burst intervals and burst durations. While these features advanced the understanding of development, disease phenotypes, and drug effects, they overlook the temporal structure of activity within bursts. Here, we developed a comprehensive framework to quantify burst shapes, the time course of network firing during bursts. Applying this approach to four datasets, including rodent- and human pluripotent stem cell-derived cultures, we show that burst shapes contain rich information about the underlying network dynamics. We quantify this information by using traditional and shape features to classify the recording conditions (types of genetic disorder, presence of pharmacological agents) and demonstrate that shapes significantly increase classification accuracy. We provide a pipeline for burst shape characterization, including simplified features that capture most of the shape information, establishing burst shape as a robust and biologically meaningful marker for functional phenotyping in disease modeling and drug screening.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Granger causality analysis for calcium transients in neuronal networks: challenges and improvements 95%
- Robust variability of grid cell properties within individual grid modules enhances encoding of local space 94%
- A conserved code for anatomy: Neurons throughout the brain embed robust signatures of their anatomical location into spike trains. 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.